Readings & Reflections: Saturday of the Twenty-second Week in Ordinary Time & Saint Peter Blessed Frédéric Ozanam, September 7,2019
![]()
In today’s Gospel, “Some Pharisees” who seem “alienated and hostile in mind” pick a quarrel with Jesus. Jesus declares the Sabbath a day of mercies to honor God, a day for doing good, for saving life (cf. CCC 2173). Through the re-creation wrought in Christ, “God has reconciled you.” May self-righteousness cede to the memory of such mercy and to persevering in the faith. Like that growing field of grain, we remain “firmly grounded.”
AMDG+
Opening Prayer
“Lord Jesus, may I honor you in my work and in my rest and treat my neighbor with respect and kindness. Keep me free from a critical and intolerant spirit that I may seek the good of my neighbor in all situations.” In your Name, I pray. Amen.
Reading I
Col 1:21-23
Brothers and sisters:
You once were alienated and hostile in mind because of evil deeds;
God has now reconciled you
in the fleshly Body of Christ through his death,
to present you holy, without blemish,
and irreproachable before him,
provided that you persevere in the faith,
firmly grounded, stable,
and not shifting from the hope of the Gospel that you heard,
which has been preached to every creature under heaven,
of which I, Paul, am a minister.
The word of the Lord.
Responsorial Psalm
Ps 54:3-4, 6 and 8
R. (6) God himself is my help.
O God, by your name save me,
and by your might defend my cause.
O God, hear my prayer;
hearken to the words of my mouth.
R. God himself is my help.
Behold, God is my helper;
the Lord sustains my life.
Freely will I offer you sacrifice;
I will praise your name, O LORD, for its goodness.
R. God himself is my help.
Gospel
Lk 6:1-5
While Jesus was going through a field of grain on a sabbath,
his disciples were picking the heads of grain,
rubbing them in their hands, and eating them.
Some Pharisees said,
“Why are you doing what is unlawful on the sabbath?”
Jesus said to them in reply,
“Have you not read what David did
when he and those who were with him were hungry?
How he went into the house of God, took the bread of offering,
which only the priests could lawfully eat,
ate of it, and shared it with his companions?”
Then he said to them, “The Son of Man is lord is the lord of the Sabbath.”
The Gospel of the Lord.
Reflection 1 – Jesus, the Lord of the Sabbath
It was accepted practice to do what the disciples did, “picking the heads of grain, rubbing them in their hands, and eating them” but the Pharisees objected to it because it was done on the Sabbath. This brings us back to the Sabbath dispute which the Pharisees have continued to use in downgrading the teachings of Jesus and in finding fault in His ministry.
In response to this matter, Jesus cites the example of David to show that certain basic needs, like HUNGER, should always take precedence over certain laws. He indirectly speaks to us that the spirit of the law should always be considered more than what it tries to spell out. He wanted to remind us that we should never be RIGID in our ways that we forget the very essence of what he hopes and expects from us.
This issue brings to our hearts that doing good should not be matter of WHO, WHAT and WHERE.
God’s law on love was never partial. God is not unjust. He will not forget our work and the love we have shown him by our past and present service to his people. It should therefore be our desire to give our brethren the same zeal and service at all times and without reservation. If we act accordingly till the end we can be assured of God’s bountiful promises.
Just like the Corinthian Christians in the first reading, we may have grown smug, conceited, self righteous and complacent with our spiritual progress. Let us then take extra care and examine our hearts for we may not be half as spiritual as we think ourselves to be. Let us always seek God to give us the same respectful and balanced disposition and attitude toward every law and statute and its observance.
Law and love are both good. If applied under the guidance of the Holy Spirit, they should work and be able to build up people and in turn should glorify God any day and any time whatever the circumstance may be!
“The sabbath was made for man, not man for the sabbath. That is why the Son of Man is Lord even of the sabbath.”
Direction
Do good at all times.
Prayer
Heavenly Father, bless my heart that I may always have a fuller understanding of the spirit and letter of your law. Help me to apply your law the way you would. Let me love others the way You have loved me. In Jesus I pray, amen.
Reflection 2 – The Lord of the Sabbath
The observance of the Sabbath rest is one of the Ten Commandments (Exodus 20:8-11; Deuteronomy 5:12-15). It enabled the people of Israel to worship God without the distractions of work and recalled God’s original plan of creation: to have man enter into communion with him and share in his rest. The Sabbath expresses the covenant between God and Israel and it was a way for Israel to imitate God and share in his holy rest.
The Pharisees accuse Jesus’ disciples of violating the Sabbath since they are gathering crops (Exodus 34:21). Jesus responds to the Pharisees’ accusation in three ways. He first points out that his disciples are hungry and that, because of their need, their actions of gathering grain on the Sabbath and eating it do not violate the Sabbath rest.
Second, Jesus is also revealing himself as the new David: the exception made for David and his men can also be made for Jesus and his disciples. Jesus is also comparing himself and his disciples to the priests in the Temple, who are allowed to break the Sabbath when they replace the Bread of the Presence on the Sabbath.
Third, Jesus calls himself the “Lord of the Sabbath”. He places himself above the Sabbath and, in doing so, proclaims his divinity. Jesus, with his community of disciples, forms the origin and center of a new Israel (Pope Benedict XVI,Jesus of Nazareth, vol. 1, Doubleday, 114). Jesus’ disciples will ultimately find the rest they seek in him. The new family of God is formed not by adherence to the Old Law of the Torah, but by adherence to Jesus himself and his New Law.
Jesus is God and is able to bring the Old Law (the Torah) to fulfillment in the New Law. In this way, Israel will fulfill its vocation to be a light to all the nations. What Jesus does in his teaching is bring the God of Israel to the nations, so that all the nations now pray to God and recognize Israel’s Scriptures as the word of the living God. Jesus “has brought the gift of universality, which was the one great definitive promise to Israel and the world. This universality, this faith in the one God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob – extended now in Jesus’ new family to all nations over and above the bonds of descent according to the flesh – is the fruit of Jesus’ work. It is what proves him to be the Messiah. It signals a new interpretation of the messianic promise that is based on Moses and the Prophets, but also opens them up in a completely new way” (Pope Benedict XVI, Jesus of Nazareth, vol. 1, Doubleday, 116-117).
The Apostles are servants of Christ and trustworthy stewards of the mysteries of God. The Corinthians can learn humility from Paul and Apollos, who stay within the limits set out by Scripture, by “what is written”. “Paul reprimands self-righteous Christians for their egotism and unfair criticisms. Although he describes them as wise and prosperous, his rhetorical irony implies the opposite, i.e., they are ignorant and impoverished. Their refusal to embrace the foolishness of Christ exposes their pride and reveals how petty their problems look compared to the humiliation of the apostles” (Ignatius Catholic Study Bible).
On account of Christ, Paul and the other Apostles have become like publicly disgraced criminals, fools in the eyes of the world, weak; they are held in disrepute, hungry and thirsty, poorly clad, roughly treated, homeless; and they have to work and toil to sustain themselves. They are ridiculed and persecuted, slandered and treated like rubbish and scum.
Paul admonishes the Christians in Corinth, not to shame them, but to lead them to Christ through the Gospel. Paul considers himself a father to the Corinthians, having brought them new life through the Gospel (2 Corinthians 12:14). Paul here could be referring to the connection between priesthood and fatherhood. “In the patriarchal age, fathers and first-born sons exercised the cultic ministry of building altars and offering sacrifices for their families (Gen 12:8; 22:9-13; 31:54; 46:1; Job 1:5). In the Mosaic age, God elevated Aaron and his levitical sons (Ex 40:12-15) to be the fathers and priests of the tribal family of Israel (Judg 17:10; 18:19). The same principle carries over on a spiritual level in the age of the New Covenant, where Christ, our great high priest, ordains men to the ministry of spiritual fatherhood for ‘the priestly service of the gospel’ (Rom 15:16)” (Ignatius Catholic Study Bible).
Jesus, then, is the way, the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through him. Through the calling of the twelve Apostles, Jesus forms the new Israel, the New People of God. As Christians, we are called to imitate Jesus’ humility and meekness of heart. Throughout the centuries many saints, like Paul, offer to Christians models worthy of imitation. – (Read the source: http://www.zenit.org/en/articles/daily-homily-the-lord-of-the-sabbath)
Reflection 3 – The Son of man is lord of the Sabbath
What does the commandment “keep holy the Sabbath” require of us? Or better yet, what is the primary intention behind this command? The religious leaders confronted Jesus on this issue. The “Sabbath rest” was meant to be a time to remember and celebrate God’s goodness and the goodness of his work, both in creation and redemption. It was a day set apart for the praise of God, his work of creation, and his saving actions on our behalf. It was intended to bring everyday work to a halt and to provide needed rest and refreshment.
The Lord of the Sabbath feeds and nourishes us
Jesus’ disciples are scolded by the scribes and Pharisees, not for plucking and eating corn from the fields, but for doing so on the Sabbath. In defending his disciples, Jesus argues from the Scriptures that human need has precedence over ritual custom. In their hunger, David and his men ate of the holy bread offered in the Temple (1 Samuel 21:2-7). On every Sabbath morning twelves loaves were laid before God on a golden table in the Holy Place. Each loaf represented one of the twelve tribes of Israel. No one was allowed to eat this bread except the priests because it represented the very presence of God. David understood that human need took precedence over rules and ritual regulations.
Seek the Lord’s rest and refreshment
Why didn’t the Pharisees recognize the claims of mercy over rules and regulations? Their zeal for ritual observance blinded them from the demands of charity. Jesus’ reference to the bread of the Presence alludes to the true bread from heaven which he offers to all who believe in him. Jesus, the Son of David, and the Son of Man, a title for the Messiah, declares that he is “Lord of the Sabbath.” Jesus healed on the Sabbath and he showed mercy to those in need. All who are burdened can find true rest and refreshment in him. Do you seek rest and refreshment in the Lord and in the celebration of the Lord’s Day?
“Lord Jesus, you refresh us with your presence and you sustain us with your life-giving word. Show me how to lift the burden of others, especially those who lack the basic necessities of life, and to refresh them with humble care and service.” – Read the source: http://dailyscripture.servantsoftheword.org/readings/2019/sep7.htm
Reflection 4 – Admonishing the Pharisees
Of the obstinate it is said by Solomon: They shall eat fruit of their own way, and shall be filled with their own devices…. The heart of the wise is always consistent, because, while it remains at peace in its upright convictions, it constantly urges itself to good deeds. But the heart of fools is inconsistent, because, in exhibiting itself as variable and changeable, it never remains what it was. And because certain faults beget others, as it were spontaneously, and so, too, spring from others, it is carefully to be noted that we then the better cleanse these people by reproofs, when we draw away from them the source of their bitterness. For obstinacy is begotten of pride, and fickleness of irresolution.
The obstinate, therefore, are to be admonished to realize the pride of their thoughts, and to aim at overcoming themselves. Otherwise, scorning to be outwardly influenced by the upright counsels of others, they may held captive inwardly by their pride. They are to be admonished to observe with diligence that the Son of Man, whose will was always one with that of the Father, giving us an example of the submission of our will, says: I seek not my own will, but the will of him that sent me, the Father; and that he might the more commend the agreeableness of this virtue, he declared beforehand that he would retain the same will at the Last Judgment, saying: I cannot of myself do anything, but as I hear, so I judge. With what conscience, then, can a man despise acquiescence in the will of another, when the Son of God and of Man, on coming to display the glory of his own power, testifies that he does not pass judgment as if it were his own? (Source: St. Gregory the Great, +604 A.D., Magnificant, Vol. 18, No. 7, September 2016, pp. 51-52).

Reflection 5 – Blessed Frédéric Ozanam (1813-1853 A.D.)
A man convinced of the inestimable worth of each human being, Frédéric served the poor of Paris well and drew others into serving the poor of the world. Through the St. Vincent de Paul Society, his work continues to the present day.
Frédéric was the fifth of Jean and Marie Ozanam’s 14 children, one of only three to reach adulthood. As a teenager he began having doubts about his religion. Reading and prayer did not seem to help, but long walking discussions with Father Noirot of the Lyons College clarified matters a great deal.
Frédéric wanted to study literature, although his father, a doctor, wanted him to become a lawyer. Frédéric yielded to his father’s wishes and in 1831 arrived in Paris to study law at the University of the Sorbonne. When certain professors there mocked Catholicteachings in their lectures, Frédéric defended the Church.
A discussion club which Frédéric organized sparked the turning point in his life. In this club Catholics, atheists and agnostics debated the issues of the day. Once, after Frédéric spoke about Christianity’s role in civilization, a club member said: “Let us be frank, Mr. Ozanam; let us also be very particular. What do you do besides talk to prove the faith you claim is in you?”
Frédéric was stung by the question. He soon decided that his words needed a grounding in action. He and a friend began visiting Paris tenements and offering assistance as best they could. Soon a group dedicated to helping individuals in need under the patronage of St. Vincent de Paul formed around Frédéric.
Feeling that the Catholic faith needed an excellent speaker to explain its teachings, Frédéric convinced the Archbishop of Paris to appoint Father Lacordaire, the greatest preacher then in France, to preach a Lenten series in Notre Dame Cathedral. It was well attended and became an annual tradition in Paris.
After Frédéric earned his law degree at the Sorbonne, he taught law at the University of Lyons. He also earned a doctorate in literature. Soon after marrying Amelie Soulacroix on June 23, 1841, he returned to the Sorbonne to teach literature. A well-respected lecturer, Frédéric worked to bring out the best in each student. Meanwhile, the St. Vincent de Paul Society was growing throughout Europe. Paris alone counted 25 conferences.
In 1846, Frédéric, Amelie and their daughter Marie went to Italy; there he hoped to restore his poor health. They returned the next year. The revolution of 1848 left many Parisians in need of the services of the St. Vincent de Paul conferences. The unemployed numbered 275,000. The government asked Frédéric and his co-workers to supervise the government aid to the poor. Vincentians throughout Europe came to the aid of Paris.
Frédéric then started a newspaper, The New Era, dedicated to securing justice for the poor and the working classes. Fellow Catholics were often unhappy with what Frédéric wrote. Referring to the poor man as “the nation’s priest,” Frédéric said that the hunger and sweat of the poor formed a sacrifice that could redeem the people’s humanity
In 1852 poor health again forced Frédéric to return to Italy with his wife and daughter. He died on September 8, 1853. In his sermon at Frédéric’s funeral, Lacordaire described his friend as “one of those privileged creatures who came direct from the hand of God in whom God joins tenderness to genius in order to enkindle the world.”
Frédéric was beatified in 1997. Since Frédéric wrote an excellent book entitledFranciscan Poets of the Thirteenth Century and since Frederick’s sense of the dignity of each poor person was so close to the thinking of St. Francis, it seemed appropriate to include him among Franciscan “greats.”
Comment:
Frédéric Ozanam always respected poor while offering whatever service he could. Each man, woman and child was too precious for that. Serving the poor taught Frédéric something about God that he could not have learned elsewhere.
Quote:
In his homily at the eatification Mass at Notre Dame Cathedral, Saint John Paul II mentioned that before World War II he belonged to the St. Vincent de Paul Society. He noted that Frédéric Ozanam “observed the real situation of the poor and sought to be more and more effective in ehlping them in their human development. He understood that charity must lead to efforts to rededy injutice. Charity and justice go together.”
Related St. Anthony Messenger article(s)
Bl. Frederic Ozanam: French Layman Showed Faith in Action, by Pat McCloseky, OFM
Read the source: http://www.americancatholic.org/features/saints/saint.aspx?id=1131
SAINT OF THE DAY
Catholic saints are holy people and human people who lived extraordinary lives. Each saint the Church honors responded to God’s invitation to use his or her unique gifts. God calls each one of us to be a saint.
| BLESSED ANTOINE-FRÉDÉRIC OZANAM |
|
|---|---|
| BORN | April 23, 1813 Milan, Kingdom of Italy |
| DIED | September 8, 1853 (aged 40) Marseilles, France |
| VENERATED IN | Catholic Church |
| BEATIFIED | August 22, 1997, Cathedral ofNotre Dame de Paris by Pope John Paul II |
| FEAST | September 09 |
Antoine-Frédéric Ozanam (pronounced: [ɑ̃.twan.fʁe.de.ʁik o.za.nam]; April 23, 1813 – September 8, 1853) was a French scholar. He founded with fellow students the Conference of Charity, later known as the Society of Saint Vincent de Paul.[1]He was beatified by Pope John Paul II in the Cathedral of Notre Dame de Paris in 1997, hence he may be properly calledBlessed Frederic by Catholics. His feast day is September 9.
Contents
[hide]
Life[edit]
Frédéric was born on April 23, 1813, to Jean and Marie Ozanam.[2]He was the fifth of Jean and Marie Ozanam’s 14 children, one of only three to reach adulthood.[3] His family, which believed itself to have Jewish blood, had been settled in the region around Lyon, France, for many centuries. An ancestor of Frédéric, Jacques Ozanam (1640–1717), was a notedmathematician. Jean Ozanam, Frédéric’s father, had served in the armies of the First French Republic, but with the rise to power of Napoleon Bonaparte, and the founding of the First French Empire, he turned to trade, to teaching, and finally to medicine.
Frédéric was born in Milan, but brought up in Lyon. In his youth he experienced a period of doubt regarding the Catholic faith, during which he was strongly influenced by one of his teachers at the Collège de Lyon, the priest Abbé Noirot. His conservative and religious instincts showed themselves early, and he published Réflexions sur la Doctrine de Saint-Simon a pamphlet against Saint-Simonianism in 1831,[4] which attracted the attention of the French poet and politician Alphonse de Lamartine, born in the area. Ozanam also found time to help organize and write for the Association for the Propagation of the Faith, a lay Catholic organization founded in teh city with the aim of supporting Catholic missionaries, of which many came from the area. That autumn he went to study law in Paris, where he suffered a great deal from homesickness. Ozanam fell in with the Ampère family (living for a time with the mathematician André-Marie Ampère), and through them with other prominent Catholics of the time, such as Count François-René de Chateaubriand, Jean-Baptiste Henri Lacordaire, and Charles Forbes René de Montalembert.
While still a student, Frédéric took up journalism and contributed considerably to Bailly’s Tribune catholique, which became L’Univers, a French Catholic daily newspaper that adopted a strongly ultramontane position. Ozanam and his friends revived a discussion group called a “Society of Good Studies” and formed it into a “Conference of History” which quickly became a forum for large and lively discussions among students. Their attentions turned frequently to the social teachings of the Gospel. At one meeting during a heated debate in which Ozanam and his friends were trying to prove from historical evidence alone the truth of the Catholic Church as the one founded by Christ, their adversaries declared that, though at one time the Church was a source of good, it no longer was. One voice issued the challenge, “What is your church doing now? What is she doing for the poor of Paris? Show us your works and we will believe you!”[5]
As a consequence, in May 1833 Frédéric and a group of other young men founded the charitable Society of Saint Vincent de Paul,[4]which already by the time of his death numbered upwards of 2,000 members. The founding members developed their method of service under the guidance of a Sister (now Blessed) Rosalie Rendu, a member of the Congregation of Daughters of Charity of Saint Vincent de Paul, who was prominent in serving the poor in the slums of Paris. The members of the conferences collaborated with Sister Rosalie during the time of the cholera epidemic. When fear had gripped the population, she organized the conferences in all the neighborhoods of Paris to care for the cholera victims, becoming well known in the city for her work, especially in the 12th arrondissement.[6] Frederic’s first act of charity was to take his supply of winter firewood and bring it to a widow whose husband had died of cholera.
Ozanam received the degree of doctor of law in 1836. His father, who had wanted him to study law, died on May 12, 1837. Although he preferred literature, Frédéric continued to work in the legal profession in order to support his mother.[6] Still, he also pursued his personal interest, and in 1838 he obtained the degree of doctor of letters with a thesis on Dante that then formed the basis of Ozanam’s best-known books. A year later he was appointed to a professorship of commercial law at Lyon, and in 1840, at the age of twenty-seven, assistant professor of foreign literature at the Sorbonne.[4] He decided to give a course of lectures on German Literature in the Middle Ages and in preparation for it went on a short tour of Germany. His lectures proved highly successful despite the fact that he attached fundamental importance to Christianity as the primary factor in the growth of European civilization, unlike his predecessors and most of his colleagues, who shared in the predominantly anti-Christian climate of the Sorbonne at that time.[7]
In June 1841, he married Amélie Soulacroix, daughter of the rector of the University of Lyon,[8] and the couple travelled to Italy for their honeymoon. They had a daughter, Marie.
Candelas describes Ozanam as ” … a man of great faith. He valued friendships and defended his friends no matter what the cost. He was attentive to details, perhaps to the extreme. … [H]e showed a great tenderness when dealing with his family. …He had a great reverence for his parents, and revealed his ability to sacrifice his career and his profession in order to please them.[6]
Upon the death in 1844 of Claude Charles Fauriel, Ozanam succeeded to the full professorship of foreign literature at the Sorbonne.[4]The remainder of his short life was extremely busy, attending to his duties as a professor, his extensive literary activities, and the work of district-visiting as a member of the society of St Vincent de Paul.
During the French Revolution of 1848, of which he took a sanguine view, he once more turned journalist by writing, for a short time, in various papers, including the Ère nouvelle (“New Era”), which he had founded. He traveled extensively, and visited England at the time of the Exhibition of 1851.
Death[edit]
His naturally weak constitution, however, fell a prey to consumption, which he hoped to cure by visiting Italy, but on his return to France, he died in Marseille on September 8, 1853 at the age of forty. He was buried in the crypt of the church of St. Joseph des Carmes at the Institut Catholique in Paris.[4]
Works[edit]
Ozanam was the leading historical and literary critic in the neo-Catholic movement in France during the first half of the 19th century. He was more learned, more sincere, and more logical than Chateaubriand; and less of a political partisan and less of a literary sentimentalist than Montalembert. In contemporary movements, he was an earnest and conscientious advocate of Catholic democracy and of the view that the Church should adapt itself to the changed political conditions consequent to theFrench Revolution.[9]
In his writings he dwelt upon important contributions of historical Christianity, and maintained especially that, in continuing the work of the Caesars, the Catholic Church had been the most potent factor in civilizing the invading barbarians and in organizing the life of the Middle Ages. He confessed that his object was to prove the contrary thesis to Edward Gibbon, and, although the aim of proving theses is perhaps not the ideal approach for a historian, Ozanam no doubt administered a healthful antidote to the prevalent notion, particularly amongst English-speaking peoples, that the Catholic Church had done far more to enslave than to elevate the human mind. His knowledge of medieval literature and his appreciative sympathy with medieval life admirably qualified him for his work, and his scholarly attainments are still highly esteemed.
His works were published in eleven volumes (Paris, 1862–1865). They include:
- Deux chanceliers d’Angleterre, Bacon de Verulam et Saint Thomas de Cantorbéry (Paris, 1836)
- Dante et la philosophie catholique au XIIIeme siècle (Paris, 1839; 2nd ed., enlarged 1845)[10]
- Études germaniques (2 vols., Paris, 1847–1849), translated by A. C. Glyn as History of Civilization in the Fifth Century(London, 1868)
- Documents Inédits pour servir a l’histoire de l’Italie depuis le VIIIeme siècle jusqu’au XIIeme (Paris, 1850)
- Les Poètes franciscains en Italie au XIIIme siècle (Paris, 1852)
- His letters were partly translated into English by A. Coates (London, 1886).
References[edit]
- Jump up^ Brodrick, James (1933). Frederic Ozanam and His Society. London: Burns, Oats & Washbourne, Ltd.
- Jump up^ Derum, James P. (1960). Apostle in a Top Hat; the Life of Frédéric Ozanam. Garden City, N.Y.: Hanover House.
- Jump up^ Foley O.F.M., Leonard. “Blessed Frédéric Ozanam”, Saint of the Day, Lives, Lessons and Feast, (revised by Pat McCloskey O.F.M.), Franciscan Media
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Bertrin, Georges. “Antoine-Frédéric Ozanam.” The Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 11. New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1911. 17 Sept. 2014
- Jump up^ “Blessed Frederic Ozanam”, St. Vincent de Paul Society, Australia
- ^ Jump up to:a b c Candelas D.C., M. Teresa. “Biography of Frederic Ozanam”, Vincentian Encyclopedia
- Jump up^ “Frédéric Ozanam”, Vincentian Encyclopedia[dead link]
- Jump up^ Delany, Selden P. (1935). “Frederic Ozanam (1813-1853).” In: Married Saints. New York: Longmans, Green Company, pp. 269–290.
- Jump up^ Eveline, Sister M. (1941). “The Social Thought of Frederic Ozanam,” The American Catholic Sociological Review, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 46–56.
- Jump up^ Pychowska, L. D. (1886). “Ozanam’s Dante,” The Catholic World, Vol. 43, No. 258, pp. 790–795.
Sources[edit]
- Gérard Cholvy, Frédéric Ozanam, l’Engagement d’un Intellectuel Catholique au XIXe Siècle. Paris: Fayard, 2004. Prix Roland de Jouvenel (ISBN 2-213-61482-2).
- There are French biographies of Ozanam by his brother, C. A. Ozanam (Paris, 1882); Mme E. Humbert (Paris, 1880); C. Huit (Paris, 1882); M. de Lambel (Paris, 1887); L. Curnier (Paris, 1888); and B. Faulquier (Paris, 1903)
- German biographies by F.X. Karker (Paderborn, 1867) and E. Hardy (Mainz, 1878)
This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). “