Readings & Reflections: Tuesday of the Twentieth Week in Ordinary Time & St. Bernard of Clairvaux, August 20,2019

Readings & Reflections: Tuesday of the Twentieth Week in Ordinary Time & St. Bernard of Clairvaux, August 20,2019

The “Last of the Fathers,” Bernard was born near Dijon, France. He joined the Cistercians and at twenty-four he was sent to the “Valley of Wormwood,” where he led his fellow monks in clearing the land to found Clairvaux, the “Valley of Light,” one of the great medieval monasteries. Bernard heeded the requests of popes and bishops to arbitrate disputes and rouse the faithful throughout Europe. He liked to call himself Beatae Mariae capellanus, “Mary’s faithful chaplain.” Bernard was one of the Church’s great thaumaturges or wonder-workers. Thousands would line the roads he traveled, waiting for his healing touch. Bernard was an austere reformer, a tireless preacher and an affectionate correspondent. He never left a letter unanswered. In his celebrated exchange with Peter Abelard, Bernard counseled against the hubris of the intellect, insisting that theology must be rooted in Scripture and fed with prayer. “The reason for loving God is God himself,” he wrote. “The measure is to love him beyond measure.” Bernard suffered from lifelong stomach trouble and died in 1153 A.D. “What we love,” he taught, “we shall grow to resemble.”

In today’s readings, Gideon complains to the angels, “If the Lord is with us, why has all this happened to us? The Lord has abandoned us.” The Lord responds, “Go with the strength you have. It is I who send you.” Those who obey and follow Jesus discover in a hundredfold way that “for God all things are possible.”

AMDG+

Opening Prayer

Lord God, Thank you for the incomparable treasure which no money can buy and no thief can steal.   Always bless us with your grace so we may be able to set our hearts on our highest treasure which we can only find in your everlasting kingdom. May you always be my treasure and delight and may nothing else keep me from giving you my all. In the Mighty Name of Jesus, I pray. Amen.

Reading I

JGS 6:11-24A

The angel of the LORD came and sat under the terebinth in Ophrah
that belonged to Joash the Abiezrite.
While his son Gideon was beating out wheat in the wine press
to save it from the Midianites,
the angel of the LORD appeared to him and said,
“The LORD is with you, O champion!”
Gideon said to him, “My Lord, if the LORD is with us,
why has all this happened to us?
Where are his wondrous deeds of which our fathers
told us when they said, ‘Did not the LORD bring us up from Egypt?’
For now the LORD has abandoned us
and has delivered us into the power of Midian.”
The LORD turned to him and said, “Go with the strength you have
and save Israel from the power of Midian.
It is I who send you.”
But Gideon answered him, “Please, my lord, how can I save Israel?
My family is the lowliest in Manasseh,
and I am the most insignificant in my father’s house.”
“I shall be with you,” the LORD said to him,
“and you will cut down Midian to the last man.”
Gideon answered him, “If I find favor with you,
give me a sign that you are speaking with me.
Do not depart from here, I pray you, until I come back to you
and bring out my offering and set it before you.”
He answered, “I will await your return.”

So Gideon went off and prepared a kid and a measure of flour
in the form of unleavened cakes.
Putting the meat in a basket and the broth in a pot,
he brought them out to him under the terebinth
and presented them.
The angel of God said to him, “Take the meat and unleavened cakes
and lay them on this rock; then pour out the broth.”
When he had done so,
the angel of the LORD stretched out the tip of the staff he held,
and touched the meat and unleavened cakes.
Thereupon a fire came up from the rock
that consumed the meat and unleavened cakes,
and the angel of the LORD disappeared from sight.
Gideon, now aware that it had been the angel of the LORD,
said, “Alas, Lord GOD,
that I have seen the angel of the LORD face to face!”
The LORD answered him,
“Be calm, do not fear. You shall not die.”
So Gideon built there an altar to the LORD
and called it Yahweh-shalom.

The word of the Lord. 

Responsorial Psalm

PS 85:9, 11-12, 13-14

R. (see 9b) The Lord speaks of peace to his people.
I will hear what God proclaims;
the LORD–for he proclaims peace
To his people, and to his faithful ones,
and to those who put in him their hope.
R. The Lord speaks of peace to his people.
Kindness and truth shall meet;
justice and peace shall kiss.
Truth shall spring out of the earth,
and justice shall look down from heaven.
R. The Lord speaks of peace to his people.
The LORD himself will give his benefits;
our land shall yield its increase.
Justice shall walk before him,
and salvation, along the way of his steps.
R. The Lord speaks of peace to his people.

Gospel MT 19:23-30

Jesus said to his disciples:
“Amen, I say to you, it will be hard for one who is rich
to enter the Kingdom of heaven.
Again I say to you,
it is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle
than for one who is rich to enter the Kingdom of God.”
When the disciples heard this, they were greatly astonished and said,
“Who then can be saved?”
Jesus looked at them and said,
“For men this is impossible,
but for God all things are possible.”
Then Peter said to him in reply,
“We have given up everything and followed you.
What will there be for us?”
Jesus said to them, “Amen, I say to you
that you who have followed me, in the new age,
when the Son of Man is seated on his throne of glory,
will yourselves sit on twelve thrones,
judging the twelve tribes of Israel.
And everyone who has given up houses or brothers or sisters
or father or mother or children or lands
for the sake of my name will receive a hundred times more,
and will inherit eternal life.
But many who are first will be last, and the last will be first.”

The Gospel of the Lord.

Reflection 1 – The last will be first

While we were in school, we were taught and trained to make a living and be matured adults. We were equipped to be prepared to address life and handle whatever may come our way. Our education was focused on the principles of what is right and what is morally correct. Although our education was founded on social justice and consciousness, a big emphasis was placed on how one would get ahead of everyone, be successful, accomplished and subsequently be a rich man. Sad to say, most young men who graduate from college leave school and enter the corporate world with this frame of mind. May be you did just as I did.

That was how  my younger years may have been formed but today as I walk with our Lord hand in hand, I am made to realize a lot of things, quite different from what I learned. Whereas then, I was made to focus on being always on top and ahead of others, today Jesus says: “first will be last, and the last will be first”.  In the same light, t oday, I have asked myself, just what does our Lord mean when He said: “Amen, I say to you, it will be hard for one who is rich to enter the Kingdom of heaven. Again I say to you, it is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for one who is rich to enter the Kingdom of God .” Does this imply that only the poor will be able to enter heaven? Does this mean that rich have been condemned to suffer in hell?

Our God is a good God Who cares for everyone. He is concerned about us-sinner or saint, rich or poor. God does not show any partiality, neither is He against wealth and abundance as everything comes from Him. All God wants from us is for us not to hold on, not to be attached to our “riches”, what we have held and considered important in this world.

They can be our material riches and wealth, our career, our intellect, our bondage to pleasure, even our power and influence and most importantly our pride. They could also be our bitter memories of yesterday, which could have used up most of our today. Anything we may have so kept deep within us, God considers as our “riches” as they blind and suffocate us from receiving Him, His grace and the fullness of life that awaits us.

Brethren, let us give up everything that has been an obstacle in our relationship with our God and let His immeasurable love penetrate our hearts. Let us ask our Lord to dwell in our hearts and to freely work in us, so that He may mold us and transform us. Let us totally rely on His goodness and grace and open our lives to Him so that we may receive the abundance of our eternal inheritance. “The LORD himself will give His benefits; our land shall yield its increase. Justice shall walk before him, and salvation, along the way of his steps.” Yes, “many who are first will be last, and the last will be first!”

Direction

Replace our “riches” with God’s grace. Depend on Him totally.

Prayer

Heavenly Father, fill my heart with your grace.   Let me live the fullness of life that I have in Jesus. In Him I live and pray. Amen.

Reflection 2 – Who can enter the kingdom of heaven?

Was Jesus really against wealth (Matthew 19:23)? And why did he issue such a strong warning to the rich (as well as to the rest of us who desire to be rich)? We know that Jesus was not opposed to wealth per se, nor was he opposed to the wealthy. He had many friends who were well-to-do, including some notorious tax collectors! One even became an apostle! Jesus’ warning reiterated the wisdom of the Old Testament:  “Better is a poor man who walks in his integrity than a rich man who is perverse in his ways” (Proverbs 28:6; see also Psalm 37:16). “Do not wear yourself out to get rich; be wise enough to desist” (Proverbs 23:4).

We are all poor beggars in need of God
Jesus seems to say that it is nearly impossible for the rich to live as citizens of God’s kingdom. The camel was regarded as the largest animal in Palestine. The “eye of the needle” could be interpreted quite literally or it could figuratively describe the narrow and low gate of the city walls which was used by travelers when the larger public gate was locked at night. Normal sized people had to “lower” themselves to enter that gate. A camel would literally have to kneel and crawl through it. Until we humbly kneel before the Lord and acknowledge our total need and dependence on him, we will not find true peace, security, and happiness that can sustain us now and forever. Only God alone can satisfy our deepest need and longing.

Augustine of Hippo reminds us that we are all poor beggars of God.

“Even though you possess plenty, you are still poor. You abound in temporal possessions, but you need things eternal. You listen to the needs of a human beggar, yet you yourself are a beggar of God. What you do with those who beg from you is what God will do with his beggar. You are filled and you are empty. Fill your empty neighbor from your fullness, so that your emptiness may be filled with God’s fullness.” (Sermon 56,9)

Possessions can create false security and independence
Why is Jesus so cautious about wealth? Wealth can make us falsely independent. The church at Laodicea was warned about their attitude towards wealth and a false sense of security: “For you say, I am rich, I have prospered, and I need nothing” (Revelations 3:17). Wealth can also lead us into hurtful desires and selfishness (see 1 Timothy 6:9-10). Look at the lesson Jesus gave about the rich man and his sons who refused to aid the poor man Lazarus (see Luke 16:19ff). They neglected to serve God. Only those who put their trust in God and who depend on him, and who share what they have with those in need, will find true peace, security, and happiness which lead to everlasting life and joy in God’s kingdom.

Where is your treasure?
The Scriptures give us a paradox – we lose what we keep and we gain what we give away. Generosity will be amply repaid, both in this life and in the age to come (Proverbs 3:9-10, Luke 6:38). Jesus offers us an incomparable treasure which no money can buy and no thief can steal. The thing we most set our heart on is our highest treasure. Material wealth will shackle us to this earth unless we guard our hearts and set our treasure in God and his everlasting kingdom. Where is your treasure?

“Lord Jesus, you have captured our hearts and opened to us the treasures of heaven. May you always be my treasure and delight and may nothing else keep me from giving you my all.” – Read the source: http://dailyscripture.servantsoftheword.org/readings/2019/aug20.htm

Reflection 3 – Camel and eye of the needle

A study in Psychology Today in May 1981, probed the influence of money on people’s lives. One of its conclusions was that people who are the most money conscious are much less likely to be involved in a satisfactory love relationship and tend to be troubled by constant worry, anxiety, and loneliness. The story of the rich young ruler, which immediately precedes Peter’s question, sadly but eloquently, reveals the power of money to control one’s life. The young man’s tragedy was not that he possessed wealth, but that wealth possessed him. He would not let go of wealth to take hold of the eternal life offered by the Son of God. His trust was in his wealth, not his God.

In a society where wealth was often seen to be a sign of divine approval and acceptance, the Lord’s statement startled the disciples: “It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God” (Mt 19:24). Salvation is not the attainment of the rich or successful. It is a gift of God’s grace, freely given and humbly received.

Reflection 4 – Your heart has grown haughty from your riches

The prophecies of Ezekiel 1-24 are prophecies of judgment directed primarily to Israel; chapters 33-48 are prophecies about Israel’s restoration. Nestled between these two sections are eight chapters (25-32) of prophecies against Gentile nations like Tyre, Sidon and Egypt.

Today, Ezekiel foretells the ruin of Tyre. The Tyrian King, Ithobaal III, has grown prideful, going so far as to think that he is a god and has the wisdom of a god. He has grown wealthy, but this has only increased his pride. Because of his pride, Ezekiel says that he will be brought down by strangers and foreigners. In fact, after laying siege to Jerusalem, Nebuchadnezzar II, the King of Babylon, would attack Tyre for 13 years, beginning in 586 or 585 B.C.

In her Magnificat, Mary will sing about how God humbles the prideful and raises up the lowly: “He has shown strength with his arm, he has scattered the proud in the imagination of their hearts, he has put down the mighty from their thrones, and exalted those of low degree; he has filled the hungry with good things, and the rich he has sent empty away” (Luke 1:51-53).

Jesus today remarks how hard it is for those who are rich to enter the kingdom of God. The King of Tyre grew in wealth and pride and forgot that he was dependent on God, his Creator and Lord. Instead of possessing divine wisdom, he fell into foolishness. He stored up treasure on earth and not in heaven.

Peter and the other Apostles, on the other hand, have left everything to follow Jesus. They are given a share in Christ’s kingly authority. Jesus assures them that their sacrifices will not go unrewarded. They will receive a hundredfold in this life and, what is more, the gift of eternal life.

Jesus’ last saying can be interpreted in this light: the rich young man, who went away sad, is among the first in this world, but is actually among the last; the Apostles, who are considered among the last in this world, having left everything behind, are actually first in the Kingdom of heaven. This is a Kingdom that belongs to the poor in spirit, and not those attached to material wealth. – Read the source text: http://www.zenit.org/en/articles/daily-homily-your-heart-has-grown-haughty-from-your-riches

Reflection 5 – Getting my due

Bill Borden was born a blue blood and brought up with a silver spoon in his mouth. His parents were both descended from British aristocracy, and his father had made a fortune in a real estate in Chicago and in silver mining in Colorado. Bill was already worth a million dollars by the age of 21, an amount in 1908 equivalent to about 40 million dollars today. He was also handsome, intelligent, well-educated and popular.

But in 1912, at the age of 25, Bill Borden did two things that made headlines. First, he gave away his entire fortune, half to God’s work in the United States and half to missions overseas. Second, he chose to set sail for missionary work among the Muslims, first in Egypt to learn Arabic and then, ultimately, to a remote part of China.

To the public and the media, and even to many of his Christian friends, Borden’s actions seemed incredibly wasteful, especially when he died of cerebrospinal meningitis shortly after reaching Cairo. He had apparently thrown away his money, his career, and even his life. To what end?

What makes a Bill Borden tick? What makes a person turn his back on virtually everything most people value to live in obedience to what he believes to be the will of God? What’s in it for him? What are the returns on that kind of investment?

The book of Job records a fascinating exchange between God and Satan. When the Lord challenged Satan to consider Job as an example of godly character and personal integrity, Satan threw back an accusation: “Does Job fear God for nothing?… You have blessed the work of his hands… But stretch out your hand and strike everything he has, and he will surely curse you to your face” (Job 1:9-11). That attack goes right to the heart of all Christian living and worship. “Hah! God, he doesn’t serve You because he loves and trusts you, but because you bless him. Take away the goodies and the rewards, and he’ll forget about you. No one serves You just because you’re you!”

That accusation is powerful and discomforting and very modern. Just why do I serve the Lord Jesus? Is He enough, or am I held more by what He gives than who He is? There is no need to feel embarrassed about God’s blessings. Scripture does promise rewards and blessings for the obedient. But it that our motivation? Because if it is, our enthusiasm will probably wear thin in difficult times. Something deeper than the promise of rewards and blessings must hold us.

Satan’s accusation thus becomes a penetrating question. Why do I serve the Lord Jesus? Why should I serve the Savior? And it brings us to an interesting discussion between the Lord and his disciples, in which He addressed the question of rewards, posed by Peter, and used a parable to provoke them and us into deeper thought about spiritual motivation. As Matthew recounts the story, the discussion followed the Lord’s encounter with the rich young ruler (Mt 19:16-26).

The Promise of Rewards: The Blessing of Discipleship

Peter answered him, “We have left everything to follow you! What then will there be for us?” Jesus said to them, “I tell you the truth, at the renewal of all things, when the Son of Man sits on his glorious throne, you who have followed me will also sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel. And everyone who has left houses or brothers or sisters or father or mother or children or fields for my sake will receive a hundred times as much and will inherit eternal life. But many who are first will be last, and many who are last will be first” (Mt 19:27-30).

A study in Psychology Today in May 1981, probed the influence of money on people’s lives. One of its conclusions was that people who are the most money conscious are much less likely to be involved in a satisfactory love relationship and tend to be troubled by constant worry, anxiety, and loneliness. The story of the rich young ruler, which immediately precedes Peter’s question, sadly but eloquently, reveals the power of money to control one’s life. The young man’s tragedy was not that he possessed wealth, but that wealth possessed him. He would not let go of wealth to take hold of the eternal life offered by the Son of God. His trust was in his wealth, not his God.

In a society where wealth was often seen to be a sign of divine approval and acceptance, the Lord’s statement startled the disciples: “It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God” (Mt 19:24). Salvation is not the attainment of the rich or successful. It is a gift of God’s grace, freely given and humbly received.

But Peter was not affected by the drama of salvation being enacted before him so much as by the Lord’s promise to the rich young man: “Go, sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me” (Mt 19:21). Peter’s mind had been riveted by the implications of “treasure in heaven… follow me.” “If that is true for him, what about us,” he mused. “We’ve done that. I left my nets and followed Jesus (Mt 4:18-22). What about my treasure?” Finally he blurted out his concern: “We have left everything to follow you! What then will there be for us?”

Only a person who is badly self-deceived is had on Peter. We may not be very proud of the “what’s-in-it-for-me?” feeling but it bubbles in all of us, sometimes closer to the surface that at other times. “It pays to serve Jesus,” we sing. “It pays every day; it pays every step of the way.” But sometimes the pay seems long overdue. We face fatigue, frustration, failure or physical illness instead of blessing, joy and fulfillment. “What’s in it for me? When and how do I get some of this treasure?”

The Lord’s response to Peter is not one of rebuke but of reaffirmation. It is not wrong to focus on rewards and eternal blessings, not is it carnal to desire “treasure in heaven.” The Lord often extends the promise of rewards in the gospels (see, for example, Mt 5:10-12; 6:19-21; 10:41-42; 24:45; 25:20-23). These are not demeaning bribes or the incentive programs of a sales organization. They are rather the appropriate results of a life pleasing to the God who “rewards those who earnestly seek him” (Heb 11:6).

So the Lord directs Peter’s attention to the millennial kingdom, “renewal of all things, when the Son of Man sits on his glorious throne.” This is the time prophesied throughout the Old Testament, when God would establish the kingdom of Messiah on the earth in power and glory (Daniel 7:13-22), and creation itself would become “new heavens and a new earth” (Is 65:17; 66:22). This is the time all the disciples longed for, Peter no less than the rest.

Not only will the Lord Jesus sit on the throne of His glory in the new earth, but the apostles will share this glory. “You who have followed me will also sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel.” It is impossible to describe how the twelve might have received this news. As Jews, they had longed for the Messiah, and they had staked everything on Jesus as Messiah. Their reward would go beyond their furthest imaging: When Israel was the greatest nation on earth, they would rule over it, as subordinates of King Jesus Himself!

The promise made in Mat 19:28 is, of course, a very specific one, made to the twelve apostles. But there is an extension of this promise to all believers. When Messiah Jesus returns, we who are His co-heirs (Rom 8:17) will share in His glory, reigning with Him on the earth (Rev 5:10). In fact, we will not only judge the world, we will exercise judgment over the angels (1 Cor 6:1-3). I do not pretend to know all that this entails, but the promise is clear. Believers in Christ are the royal family of Messiah’s kingdom, and part of our “treasure in heaven” will be to share in His regal authority and splendor.

But on what basis will this privilege be granted? In Mt 19:29, the Lord establishes the principle of rewards. Present sacrifice produces eternal privilege. “Everyone who has left houses or brothers or sisters or father or mother or children or field for my sake will receive a hundred times as much and will inherit eternal life.” Mark, in his account, adds the fascinating words “receive a hundred times as much in this present age” (Mk 10:30). Obviously, the equation is not to be pressed literally. After all, who wants to receive a hundred wives or two hundred brothers? We could try to twist the statement into a formula for materialistic gain: “I give $100, I get $10,000.” On that basis, we would be worse than the rich young ruler, and his tragedy would not be that he loved money more than God, but that he didn’t know a good investment when he saw one! No, the Lord’s point is to say that there is a blessing, both now and in eternity, that is out of all proportion to the cost of discipleship. Whatever losses following Christ entail (and there are losses – we leave thing behind), the Savior Himself will repay richly. Following may not feel like it pays – it clearly didn’t for Job when he sat suffering on the ash heap. But in God’s time and way it certainly does.

So the Lord summarizes with two points. “Many who are first will be last.” From an earthly perspective, the rich young man was one of the first. He looked and lived like a winner. But in the crucible of decision about Christ, he made a choice that excluded him from the true wealth. Those who look like winners from a human perspective are often life’s losers. Conversely, “many ho are last will be first.” The disciples represent the “last.” Uprooted from family and vocation, they wandered as the vagabond followers of a rejected leader. Like Bill Borden, they had taken a huge risk and apparently had come up empty. But appearances can be very deceptive. When they are seated on their millennial thrones alongside King Jesus, they will be revealed as God’s first on the earth.

Peter’s question has been answered. “Lord, what’s in it for us?” “More, Peter, than you can ever imagine. You have given what you couldn’t keep; you will gain what you can never lose.” And that answer should be sufficient for every one of us. Although we do not see them all now, there are blessings and rewards. We must not demean this promise. But there is a troubling note to Peter’s questions, which must still be dealt with. Behind, “What’s in it for me?” there lurks a commercial spirit that misses the essence of Christian living. It is that underlying attitude, present not only in Peter but also in me, that the Lord addresses in the parable of the workers in the vineyard, recorded in Mt 20:1-16. The line with which the parable ends links it closely to the last phrase of chapter 19, which we have just discussed (Source: Gary Inrig, The Parables: Understanding What Jesus Meant. Michigan: Discovery House Publishers, 1991).

Reflection 6 – How to enter the kingdom of God

In today’s Gospel reading, Jesus says, “Only with difficulty can one who is rich enter the kingdom of heaven.” Lest we think we’re exempt from this warning if we’re not wealthy or because, if wealthy, we use church attendance as a guarantee for living in God’s kingdom, God gives us today’s first reading for an examination of conscience.

He says in those verses: “By your wisdom and your intelligence you have made riches for yourself.”Your wisdom, your intelligence. We can ask ourselves, “What am I rich in (and not necessarily material wealth) by my own doing? What did I achieve in abundance without prayerfully seeking God’s approval and relying on his guidance and help?

Jesus tells us that we must let go of our attachments to the world so that we can enter fully into the kingdom of God, not just when we die, but now, so that we can experience his unconditional love each moment of every earthly day.

We pile so many worldly (unGodly) attachments upon our backs that we’re like camels laden with luggage! None of this baggage can squeeze through the gate into God’s kingdom. If we try to hold onto them, we don’t fit through the gate.

We are rich in “doing things my way.” In the kingdom of God, everything is done his way, which of course is the best way. No “conditional” love can get through, because it’s not truly love. The attitude of, “If you make me happy, I will approve of you and accept you and be nice to you” is a huge load of trash. It’s not love at all. And so is, “If same-sex lovers love each other, then we should believe that God approves of same-sex marriages.”

The garbage that others have thrown at us won’t fit either. Nor will the emotional bandages that we use for covering the wounds they inflicted upon us. Jesus has already taken all of our blows upon himself. If we’re still wounded by them, it’s only because we haven’t surrendered to every method of healing that he knows will heal us.

We can’t include the baggage of self-righteousness or pride. We don’t need it anyway, because Jesus is proud enough of us. We have to drop the baggage of low self-esteem, because Jesus shows us our true worth, and it is far greater than we think it is.

Identifying all of our worldly bags so that we can free ourselves from their weight seems impossible. The disciples asked, “Then who can be saved?” Jesus answered, “For you this is impossible, but if you seek God’s help, it will become very possible.”

It starts with this daily attitude: “Forgive me, Lord, and help me to identify all my bad habits, addictions, unloving ways, and worldly wisdom. With your gentle but persistent help, I will let go of my baggage and live more fully in your kingdom now and become more ready for heaven when I die. Increase my desire to get rid of everything that does not belong to you. Amen!” – Read the source:  http://gnm.org/good-news-reflections/?useDrDate=2016-08-16

Reflection 7 – Where’s the peace?

In our responsorial Psalm today, God is speaking his peace to you. And when God utters a word, it is so. Of course it is so! He is God! Well, do you see kindness and truth “meeting” in your life? Are justice and peace “kissing” you?

Yes! –  if your hope is in God, as the psalmist says of God’s faithful ones. Even while injustices are being committed against you, God’s justice is with you. The problem is that the Lord’s peace might be lost in the crowdedness of everything else that’s going on.

In our Gospel reading today, Jesus mentions two significant ways we lose this peace: by accumulating material goods only for our own sake and by depending upon family relationships (including friends who are like family) to get all that we need emotionally and spiritually. We can’t have peace when we expect money and possessions to satisfy us, because it’s never enough. We can’t have peace when we expect others to make us happy, because they repeatedly disappoint us.

The cure, Jesus says, is to keep our eyes on him. Giving up everything to follow Jesus does not mean kicking our possessions out the door. Rather, it means making them available to Jesus for him to do with as he wants, for his holy purposes. We share what we have because we care, recognizing that God has given us everything we own so that we can benefit from it and we can distribute it to others. Not only is there great peace in having the freedom to do this, but great satisfaction as well.

Giving up relationships to follow Jesus means depending on him, instead of family and friends, to satisfy all of our needs. Although these people are called to be good to us, their imperfect love creates holes in our lives, holes that hurt. God wants to live in these holes so that he can comfort us, but if we stuff the holes with anger or addictions, there’s no room for him. By depending on Jesus and recognizing that he suffered for our sake, we can endure the pain while he works on the hearts of the people who should be filling those holes. What if this takes the rest of their lives? Well, there will be an eternity for enjoying their love.

Sometimes God closes a hole so that it no longer exists, enabling us to give up a relationship entirely. Then, we feel no pain or sorrow. Maybe that’s how it happens when loved ones go to hell and we have to spend eternity without them. We feel sad for someone who dies rejecting Christ, but it’s not a painful kind of sorrow after God heals us.

When praying for an end to a problem, we have to wait, in full trust, for God’s often-unusual solutions. And while praying for a change in the hearts of the people who hurt us, we should ask Jesus to give us his patience and his supernatural love for them. True peace is found only when we lean on him and make him the most important person in our lives.

By depending on God and placing our hope in his love, hope becomes trust. And trust becomes peace. – Read the source: http://gnm.org/good-news-reflections/?useDrDate=2017-08-22

If you need help finding this peace in the midst of painful relationships, download my e-book The Path to Healing in Difficult Relationships, published by Catholic Digital Resources: catholicdr.com/ebooks/relationships.htm

Reflection 8 – St. Bernard of Clairvaux (1091-1153 A.D.)

Man of the century! Woman of the century! You see such terms applied to so many today—“golfer of the century,” “composer of the century,” “right tackle of the century”—that the line no longer has any punch. But Western Europe’s “man of the twelfth century,” without doubt or controversy, has to be Bernard of Clairvaux. Adviser of popes, preacher of the Second Crusade, defender of the faith, healer of a schism, reformer of a monastic Order, Scripture scholar, theologian and eloquent preacher: any one of these titles would distinguish an ordinary man. Yet Bernard was all of these—and he still retained a burning desire to return to the hidden monastic life of his younger days.

In the year 1111, at the age of 20, Bernard left his home to join the monastic community of Citeaux. His five brothers, two uncles and some 30 young friends followed him into the monastery. Within four years a dying community had recovered enough vitality to establish a new house in the nearby valley of Wormwoods, with Bernard as abbot. The zealous young man was quite demanding, though more on himself than others. A slight breakdown of health taught him to be more patient and understanding. The valley was soon renamed Clairvaux, the valley of light.

His ability as arbitrator and counselor became widely known. More and more he was lured away from the monastery to settle long-standing disputes. On several of these occasions he apparently stepped on some sensitive toes in Rome. Bernard was completely dedicated to the primacy of the Roman See. But to a letter of warning from Rome, he replied that the good fathers in Rome had enough to do to keep the Church in one piece. If any matters arose that warranted their interest, he would be the first to let them know.

Shortly thereafter it was Bernard who intervened in a full-blown schism and settled it in favor of the Roman pontiff against the antipope.

The Holy See prevailed on Bernard to preach the Second Crusade throughout Europe. His eloquence was so overwhelming that a great army was assembled and the success of the crusade seemed assured. The ideals of the men and their leaders, however, were not those of Abbot Bernard, and the project ended as a complete military and moral disaster.

Bernard felt responsible in some way for the degenerative effects of the crusade. This heavy burden possibly hastened his death, which came August 20, 1153.

Comment:

Bernard’s life in the Church was more active than we can imagine possible today. His efforts produced far-reaching results. But he knew that they would have availed little without the many hours of prayer and contemplation that brought him strength and heavenly direction. His life was characterized by a deep devotion to the Blessed Mother. His sermons and books about Mary are still the standard of Marian theology.

Quote:

“In dangers, in doubts, in difficulties, think of Mary, call upon Mary. Let not her name depart from your lips, never suffer it to leave your heart. And that you may more surely obtain the assistance of her prayer, neglect not to walk in her footsteps. With her for guide, you shall never go astray; while invoking her, you shall never lose heart; so long as she is in your mind, you are safe from deception; while she holds your hand, you cannot fall; under her protection you have nothing to fear; if she walks before you, you shall not grow weary; if she shows you favor, you shall reach the goal” (St. Bernard).

Read the source:  http://www.americancatholic.org/features/saints/saint.aspx?id=1113

SAINT OF THE DAY
Catholic saints are holy people and human people who lived extraordinary lives. Each saint the Church honors responded to God’s invitation to use his or her unique gifts. God calls each one of us to be a saint.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia:   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernard_of_Clairvaux 
SAINT BERNARD OF CLAIRVAUX
Bernard of Clairvaux - Gutenburg - 13206.jpg

St Bernard in “A Short History of Monks and Monasteries” by Alfred Wesley Wishart (1900).
ABBOT
CONFESSOR
DOCTOR OF THE CHURCH
DOCTOR MELLIFLUUS
BORN 1090
Fontaine-lès-Dijon, France
DIED 20 August, 1153 (aged 62–63)
Clairvaux, France
VENERATED IN Roman Catholic Church,Anglican ChurchLutheran Church
CANONIZED 18 January 1174, Rome byPope Alexander III
MAJOR SHRINE Troyes Cathedral
Ville-sous-la-Ferté, religious vocations, preachers.
FEAST 20 August
ATTRIBUTES White Cistercian habit, devil on a chain, white dog
PATRONAGE CisterciansBurgundy, beekeepers, candlemakers,GibraltarAlgecirasQueens’ College, CambridgeSpeyer CathedralKnights Templar

Bernard of Clairvaux (LatinBernardus Claraevallensis), O.Cist (1090 – 20 August 1153) was a French abbot and the primary reformer for the Cistercian order.

After the death of his mother, Bernard sought admission into the Cistercian order. “Three years later, he was sent to found a new abbey at an isolated clearing in a glen known as the Val d’Absinthe, about 15 kilometres (9.3 mi) southeast of Bar-sur-Aube. According to tradition, Bernard founded the monastery on 25 June 1115, naming it Claire Vallée, which evolved into Clairvaux. There Bernard would preach an immediate faith, in which the intercessor was the Virgin Mary.”[1] In the year 1128, Bernard attended the Council of Troyes, at which he traced the outlines of the Rule of the Knights Templar,[a]which soon became the ideal of Christian nobility.

On the death of Pope Honorius II on 13 February 1130, a schism broke out in the Church. King Louis VI of Franceconvened a national council of the French bishops at Étampes in 1130, and Bernard was chosen to judge between the rivals for pope. After the council of Étampes, Bernard spoke with King Henry I of England, also known as Henry Beauclerc, about Henry I’s reservations regarding Pope Innocent II. Henry I was sceptical because most of the bishops of England supported Antipope Anacletus II; Bernard persuaded him to support Innocent. Germany had decided to support Innocent through Norbert of Xanten, who was a friend of Bernard’s. However, Innocent insisted on Bernard’s company when he met with Lothair II, Holy Roman Emperor. Lothair III became Innocent’s strongest ally among the nobility. Despite the councils of Étampes, WurzburgClermont, and Rheims all supporting Innocent, there were still large portions of the Christian world supporting Anacletus. At the end of 1131, the kingdoms of France, England, Germany, Portugal,Castile, and Aragonsupported Innocent; however, most of Italy, southern France, and Sicily, with thepatriarchs ofConstantinopleAntioch, and Jerusalem,[clarify] supported Anacletus. Bernard set out to convince these other regions to rally behind Innocent. The first person whom he went to was Gerard of Angoulême. He proceeded to write a letter known as Letter 126, which questioned Gerard’s reasons for supporting Anacletus. Bernard would later comment that Gerard was his most formidable opponent during the whole schism. After convincing Gerard, Bernard traveled to visit William X, Duke of Aquitaine. He was the hardest for Bernard to convince. He did not pledge allegiance to Innocent until 1135. After that, Bernard spent most of his time in Italy convincing the Italians to pledge allegiance to Innocent. He traveled to Sicily in 1137 to convince the king of Sicily to follow Innocent. The whole conflict ended when Anacletus died on 25 January 1138.[2] In 1139, Bernard assisted at the Second Council of the Lateran. Bernard denounced the teachings of Peter Abelard to the pope, who called a council at Sens in 1141 to settle the matter. Bernard soon saw one of his disciples elected as Pope Eugene III. Having previously helped end the schism within the church, Bernard was now called upon to combat heresy. In June 1145, Bernard traveled in southern France and his preaching there helped strengthen support against heresy.

Following the Christian defeat at the Siege of Edessa, the pope commissioned Bernard to preach the Second Crusade. The last years of Bernard’s life were saddened by the failure of the crusaders, the entire responsibility for which was thrown upon him. Bernard died at age 63, after 40 years spent in the cloister. He was the first Cistercian placed on thecalendar of saints, and was canonized by Pope Alexander III on 18 January 1174. In 1830 Pope Pius VIII bestowed upon Bernard the title “Doctor of the Church“.

Early life (1090–1113)[edit]

Bernard’s parents were Tescelin de Fontaine (de), Lord of Fontaine-lès-Dijon and Alèthe de Montbard (fr), both belonging to the highest nobility of Burgundy. Bernard was the third of a family of seven children, six of whom were sons. At the age of nine years, he was sent to school at Châtillon-sur-Seine, run by the secular canons of Saint-Vorles. Bernard had a great taste for literature and devoted himself for some time to poetry. His success in his studies won the admiration of his teachers. He wanted to excel in literature in order to take up the study of the Bible. He had a special devotion to the Virgin Mary, and he would later write several works about theQueen of Heaven.[3]

The Vision of St Bernard, by Fra Bartolommeo, c. 1504 (Uffizi).

Bernard would expand upon Anselm of Canterbury‘s role in transmuting the sacramentally ritual Christianity of the Early Middle Ages into a new, more personally held faith, with the life of Christ as a model and a new emphasis on the Virgin Mary. In opposition to the rational approach to divine understanding that the scholasticsadopted, Bernard would preach an immediate faith, in which the intercessor was the Virgin Mary.

Bernard was only nineteen years of age when his mother died. During his youth, he did not escape trying temptations and around this time he thought of retiring from the world and living a life of solitude and prayer.[4]

In 1098 Saint Robert of Molesme had founded Cîteaux Abbey, near Dijon, with the purpose of restoring the Rule of St Benedictin all its rigour. Returning to Molesme, he left the government of the new abbey to Saint Alberic of Cîteaux, who died in the year 1109. At the age of 22, while Bernard was at prayer in a church, he felt the calling of God to enter the Cistercian Monks of Cîteaux.[5] In 1113 Saint Stephen Harding had just succeeded Saint Alberic as third Abbot of Cîteaux when Bernard and thirty other young noblemen of Burgundy sought admission into the Cistercian order.[6] Bernard’s testimony was so irresistible that 30 of his friends, brothers, and relatives followed him into the monastic life.[5]

Abbot of Clairvaux (1115–28)[edit]

Bernard exorcising a possession, altarpiece by Jörg Breu the Elder, c. 1500.

The little community of reformed Benedictines at Cîteaux, which would have so profound an influence on Western monasticism, grew rapidly. Three years later, Bernard was sent with a band of twelve monks to found a new house at Vallée d’Absinthe,[5] in the Diocese of Langres. This Bernard named Claire Vallée, or Clairvaux, on 25 June 1115, and the names of Bernard and Clairvaux would soon become inseparable.[4] During the absence of the Bishop of Langres, Bernard was blessed as abbot byWilliam of ChampeauxBishop of Châlons-sur-Marne. From that moment a strong friendship sprang up between the abbot and the bishop, who was professor of theology at Notre Dame of Paris, and the founder of the Abbey of St. Victor, Paris.[3]

The beginnings of Clairvaux Abbey were trying and painful. The regime was so austere that Bernard became ill, and only the influence of his friend William of Champeaux and the authority of the general chapter could make him mitigate the austerities. The monastery, however, made rapid progress. Disciples flocked to it in great numbers and put themselves under the direction of Bernard. The reputation of his holiness soon attracted 130 new monks, including his own father.[5] His father and all his brothers entered Clairvaux to pursue religious life, leaving only Humbeline, his sister, in the secular world. She, with the consent of her husband, soon took the veil in the Benedictine nunnery of Jully-les-NonnainsGerard of Clairvaux, Bernard’s older brother, became the cellarer of Citeaux. The abbey became too small for its members and it was necessary to send out bands to found new houses.[7] In 1118 Trois-Fontaines Abbey was founded in the diocese of Châlons; in 1119 Fontenay Abbeyin the Diocese of Autun; and in 1121 Foigny Abbey near Vervins, in the diocese of Laon. In addition to these victories, Bernard also had his trials. During an absence from Clairvaux, the Grand Prior of the Abbey of Cluny went to Clairvaux and enticed away Bernard’s cousin, Robert of Châtillon. This was the occasion of the longest and most emotional of Bernard’s letters.[3]

The abbey of Cluny as it would have looked in Bernard’s time.

In the year 1119, Bernard was present at the first general chapter of the order convoked by Stephen of Cîteaux. Though not yet 30 years old, Bernard was listened to with the greatest attention and respect, especially when he developed his thoughts upon the revival of the primitive spirit of regularity and fervour in all the monastic orders. It was this general chapter that gave definitive form to the constitutions of the order and the regulations of the Charter of Charity which Pope Callixtus II confirmed 23 December 1119. In 1120, Bernard authored his first work, De Gradibus Superbiae et Humilitatis, and his homilies which he entitled De Laudibus Mariae. The monks of the abbey of Cluny were unhappy to see Cîteaux take the lead role among the religious orders of the Roman Catholic Church. For this reason, the Black Monks attempted to make it appear that the rules of the new order were impracticable. At the solicitation of William of St. Thierry, Bernard defended the order by publishing hisApologywhich was divided into two parts. In the first part, he proved himself innocent of the charges of Cluny and in the second he gave his reasons for his counterattacks. He protested his profound esteem for the Benedictines of Cluny whom he declared he loved equally as well as the other religious orders. Peter the Venerableabbot of Cluny, answered Bernard and assured him of his great admiration and sincere friendship. In the meantime Cluny established a reform, and Abbot Suger, the minister of Louis VI of France, was converted by the Apology of Bernard. He hastened to terminate his worldly life and restore discipline in his monastery. The zeal of Bernard extended to the bishops, the clergy, and lay people. Bernard’s letter to the archbishop of Sens was seen as a real treatise, “De Officiis Episcoporum.” About the same time he wrote his work on Grace and Free Will.[3]

Doctor of the Church (1128–46)[edit]

Christ Embracing St Bernard byFrancisco Ribalta

In the year 1128 AD, Bernard participated in the Council of Troyes, which had been convoked by Pope Honorius II, and was presided over by Cardinal Matthew of Albano. The purpose of this council was to settle certain disputes of the bishops of Paris, and regulate other matters of the Church of France. The bishops made Bernard secretary of the council, and charged him with drawing up the synodal statutes. After the council, the bishop of Verdun was deposed. It was at this council that Bernard traced the outlines of the Rule of the Knights Templar who soon became the ideal of Christian nobility. Around this time, he praised them in his Liber ad milites templi de laude novae militiae.[8]

Again reproaches arose against Bernard and he was denounced, even in Rome. He was accused of being a monk who meddled with matters that did not concern him. Cardinal Harmeric, on behalf of the pope, wrote Bernard a sharp letter of remonstrance stating, “It is not fitting that noisy and troublesome frogs should come out of their marshes to trouble the Holy See and the cardinals.”[3]

Bernard answered the letter by saying that, if he had assisted at the council, it was because he had been dragged to it by force. In his response Bernard wrote,

Now illustrious Harmeric if you so wished, who would have been more capable of freeing me from the necessity of assisting at the council than yourself? Forbid those noisy troublesome frogs to come out of their holes, to leave their marshes . . . Then your friend will no longer be exposed to the accusations of pride and presumption.[3]

This letter made a positive impression on Harmeric, and in the Vatican.

Schism[edit]

Bernard’s influence was soon felt in provincial affairs. He defended the rights of the Church against the encroachments of kings and princes, and recalled to their dutyHenri Sanglier, archbishop of Sens and Stephen of Senlis, bishop of Paris. On the death of Honorius II, which occurred on 14 February 1130, a schism broke out in the Church by the election of two popes, Pope Innocent II and Antipope Anacletus II. Innocent II, having been banished from Rome by Anacletus, took refuge in France. Louis VI convened a national council of the French bishops at Étampes, and Bernard, summoned there by consent of the bishops, was chosen to judge between the rival popes. He decided in favour of Innocent II. This caused the pope to be recognized by all the great powers. He then went with him into Italy and reconciled Pisawith Genoa, and Milan with the pope. The same year Bernard was again at the Council of Reims at the side of Innocent II. He then went to Aquitaine where he succeeded for the time in detaching William X, Duke of Aquitaine, from the cause of Anacletus.[4]

Saint Bernard and the Duke of Aquitaine, by Marten Pepijn

In 1132, Bernard accompanied Innocent II into Italy, and at Cluny the pope abolished the dues which Clairvaux used to pay to that abbey. This action gave rise to a quarrel between the White Monksand the Black Monks which lasted 20 years. In May of that year, the pope, supported by the army of Lothair III, entered Rome, but Lothair III, feeling himself too weak to resist the partisans of Anacletus, retired beyond the Alps, and Innocent sought refuge in Pisa in September 1133. Bernard had returned to France in June and was continuing the work of peacemaking which he had commenced in 1130. Towards the end of 1134, he made a second journey into Aquitaine, where William X had relapsed into schism. Bernard invited William to the Mass which he celebrated in the Church of La Couldre. At the Eucharist, he “admonished the Duke not to despise God as he did His servants”.[3] William yielded and the schism ended. Bernard went again to Italy, where Roger II of Sicily was endeavouring to withdraw the Pisans from their allegiance to Innocent. He recalled the city of Milan to obedience to the pope as they had followed the deposed Anselm V, Archbishop of Milan. For this, he was offered, and he refused, the archbishopric of Milan. He then returned to Clairvaux. Believing himself at last secure in his cloister, Bernard devoted himself with renewed vigour to the composition of the works which would win for him the title of “Doctor of the Church”. He wrote at this time his sermons on theSong of Songs.[b] In 1137, he was again forced to leave his solitude by order of the pope to put an end to the quarrel between Lothair and Roger of Sicily. At the conference held at Palermo, Bernard succeeded in convincing Roger of the rights of Innocent II. He also silenced the final supporters who sustained the schism. Anacletus died of “grief and disappointment” in 1138, and with him the schism ended.[3]

In 1139, Bernard assisted at the Second Council of the Lateran, in which the surviving adherents of the schism were definitively condemned. About the same time, Bernard was visited at Clairvaux by Saint MalachyPrimate of All Ireland, and a very close friendship formed between them. Malachy wanted to become a Cistercian, but the pope would not give his permission. Malachy would die at Clairvaux in 1148.[3]

Contest with Abelard[edit]

Towards the close of the 11th century, a spirit of independence flourished within schools of philosophy and theology. This led for a time to the exaltation of human reason and rationalism. The movement found an ardent and powerful advocate in Peter Abelard. Abelard’s treatise on the Trinity had been condemned as heretical in 1121, and he was compelled to throw his own book into the fire. However, Abelard continued to develop his teachings, which were controversial in some quarters. Bernard, informed of this by William of St-Thierry, is said to have held a meeting with Abelard intending to persuade him to amend his writings, during which Abelard repented and promised to do so. But once out of Bernard’s presence, he reneged.[10] Bernard then denounced Abelard to the pope and cardinals of the Curia. Abelard sought a debate with Bernard, but Bernard initially declined, saying he did not feel matters of such importance should be settled by logical analyses. Bernard’s letters to William of St-Thierry also express his apprehension about confronting the preeminent logician. Abelard continued to press for a public debate, and made his challenge widely known, making it hard for Bernard to decline. In 1141, at the urgings of Abelard, the archbishop of Sens called a council of bishops, where Abelard and Bernard were to put their respective cases so Abelard would have a chance to clear his name.[10] Bernard lobbied the prelates on the evening before the debate, swaying many of them to his view. The next day, after Bernard made his opening statement, Abelard decided to retire without attempting to answer.[10] The council found in favour of Bernard and their judgment was confirmed by the pope. Abelard submitted without resistance, and he retired to Cluny to live under the protection of Peter the Venerable, where he died two years later.[4]

Cistercian Order and heresy[edit]

Bernard had occupied himself in sending bands of monks from his overcrowded monastery into Germany, Sweden, England, Ireland, Portugal, Switzerland, and Italy. Some of these, at the command of Innocent II, took possession of Tre Fontane Abbey, from which Eugene III would be chosen in 1145. Pope Innocent II died in the year 1143. His two successors, Pope Celestine II and Pope Lucius II, reigned only a short time, and then Bernard saw one of his disciples, Bernard of Pisa, and known thereafter as Eugene III, raised to the Chair of Saint Peter.[11] Bernard sent him, at the pope’s own request, various instructions which comprise the Book of Considerations, the predominating idea of which is that the reformation of the Church ought to commence with the sanctity of the pope. Temporal matters are merely accessories; the principles according to Bernard’s work were that piety and meditation were to precede action.[12]

Having previously helped end the schism within the Church, Bernard was now called upon to combat heresy. Henry of Lausanne, a former Cluniac monk, had adopted the teachings of the Petrobrusians, followers of Peter of Bruys and spread them in a modified form after Peter’s death.[13] Henry of Lausanne’s followers became known as Henricians. In June 1145, at the invitation of Cardinal Alberic of Ostia, Bernard traveled in southern France.[14] His preaching, aided by his ascetic looks and simple attire, helped doom the new sects. Both the Henrician and the Petrobrusian faiths began to die out by the end of that year. Soon afterwards, Henry of Lausanne was arrested, brought before the bishop of Toulouse, and probably imprisoned for life. In a letter to the people of Toulouse, undoubtedly written at the end of 1146, Bernard calls upon them to extirpate the last remnants of the heresy. He also preached against Catharism.[11]

Second Crusade (1146–49)[edit]

News came at this time from the Holy Land that alarmed Christendom. Christians had been defeated at the Siege of Edessa and most of the county had fallen into the hands of the Seljuk Turks.[15] The Kingdom of Jerusalem and the other Crusader states were threatened with similar disaster. Deputations of the bishops of Armeniasolicited aid from the pope, and the King of France also sent ambassadors. In 1144 Eugene III commissioned Bernard to preach the Second Crusade[5] and granted the same indulgences for it which Pope Urban II had accorded to the First Crusade.[16]

Bernard of Clairvaux, true effigy by Georg Andreas Wasshuber (1650–1732)

There was at first virtually no popular enthusiasm for the crusade as there had been in 1095. Bernard found it expedient to dwell upon the taking of the cross as a potent means of gaining absolution for sin and attaining grace. On 31 March, with KingLouis VII of Francepresent, he preached to an enormous crowd in a field at Vézelay. James Meeker Ludlow describes the scene, in The Age of the Crusades:

A large platform was erected on a hill outside the city. King and monk stood together, representing the combined will of earth and heaven. The enthusiasm of the assembly of Clermont in 1095, when Peter the Hermit and Urban II launched the first crusade, was matched by the holy fervor inspired by Bernard as he cried, “O ye who listen to me! Hasten to appease the anger of heaven, but no longer implore its goodness by vain complaints. Clothe yourselves in sackcloth, but also cover yourselves with your impenetrable bucklers. The din of arms, the danger, the labors, the fatigues of war, are the penances that God now imposes upon you. Hasten then to expiate your sins by victories over the Infidels, and let the deliverance of the holy places be the reward of your repentance.” As in the olden scene, the cry “Deus vult! Deus vult! ” rolled over the fields, and was echoed by the voice of the orator: “Cursed be he who does not stain his sword with blood.”[17]

When Bernard was finished the crowd enlisted en masse; they supposedly ran out of cloth to make crosses. Bernard is said to have given his own outer garments to be cut up to make more.[16] Unlike the First Crusade, the new venture attracted royalty, such as Eleanor of Aquitaine, Queen of FranceThierry of AlsaceCount of FlandersHenry, the future Count of Champagne; Louis’s brother Robert I of DreuxAlphonse I of ToulouseWilliam II of NeversWilliam de Warenne, 3rd Earl of SurreyHugh VII of Lusignan; and numerous other nobles and bishops. But an even greater show of support came from the common people. Bernard wrote to the pope a few days afterwards, “Cities and castles are now empty. There is not left one man to seven women, and everywhere there are widows to still-living husbands.”[16]

Bernard then passed into Germany, and the reported miracles which multiplied almost at his every step undoubtedly contributed to the success of his mission. Conrad III of Germany and his nephew Frederick Barbarossa, received the cross from the hand of Bernard.[15]Pope Eugenius came in person to France to encourage the enterprise. As in the First Crusade, the preaching inadvertently led to attacks on Jews; a fanatical French monk named Radulphe was apparently inspiring massacres of Jews in the Rhineland, CologneMainzWorms, and Speyer, with Radulphe claiming Jews were not contributing financially to the rescue of the Holy Land. Thearchbishop of Cologne and the archbishop of Mainz were vehemently opposed to these attacks and asked Bernard to denounce them. This he did, but when the campaign continued, Bernard traveled from Flanders to Germany to deal with the problems in person. He then found Radulphe in Mainz and was able to silence him, returning him to his monastery.[18]

The last years of Bernard’s life were saddened by the failure of the Second Crusade he had preached, the entire responsibility for which was thrown upon him.[11]Bernard considered it his duty to send an apology to the Pope and it is inserted in the second part of his “Book of Considerations.” There he explains how the sins of the crusaders were the cause of their misfortune and failures. When his attempt to call a new crusade failed, he tried to disassociate himself from the fiasco of the Second Crusade altogether.[19]

Moved by his burning words, many Christians embarked for the Holy Land, but the crusade ended in miserable failure.[5]

Final years (1149–53)[edit]

Bernard receiving milk from the breast of the Virgin Mary. The scene is a legend which allegedly took place atSpeyer Cathedral in 1146.

The death of his contemporaries served as a warning to Bernard of his own approaching end. The first to die was Suger in 1152, of whom Bernard wrote to Eugene III, “If there is any precious vase adorning the palace of the King of Kings it is the soul of the venerable Suger”. Conrad III and his son Henry died the same year. From the beginning of the year 1153, Bernard felt his death approaching. The passing of Pope Eugenius had struck the fatal blow by taking from him one whom he considered his greatest friend and consoler. Bernard died at age sixty-three on 20 August 1153, after forty years spent in the cloister.[11] He was buried at the Clairvaux Abbey, but after its dissolution in 1792 by the French revolutionary government, his remains were transferred to Troyes Cathedral.

Theology[edit]

Main article: Doctor Mellifluus

Bernard was named a Doctor of the Church in 1830. At the 800th anniversary of his death, Pope Pius XII issued an encyclical on Bernard, Doctor Mellifluus, in which he labeled him “The Last of the Fathers.” Bernard did not reject human philosophy which is genuine philosophy, which leads to God; he differentiates between different kinds of knowledge, the highest being theological. Three central elements of Bernard’s Mariology are how he explained the virginity of Mary, the “Star of the Sea”, how the faithful should pray on the Virgin Mary, and how he relied on the Virgin Mary as Mediatrix.

Bernard, like Thomas Aquinas, denied the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception of Mary.[20][irrelevant citation][21][22] John Calvinquotes Bernard several times[23] in support of the doctrine of Sola Fide,[24]which Martin Luther described as the article upon which the church stands or falls.[25] Calvin also quotes him in setting forth his doctrine of a forensic alien righteousness, or as it is commonly called imputed righteousness.[26]

Temptations and intercessions[edit]

One day, to cool down his lustful temptation, Bernard threw himself into ice-cold water. Another time, while sleeping in an inn, a prostitute was introduced naked beside him, and he saved his chastity by running.[5]

Many miracles were attributed to his intercession. One time he restored the power of speech to an old man that he might confess his sins before he died. Another time, an immense number of flies, that infested the Church of Foigny, died instantly after the excommunication he made on them.[5]

So great was his reputation that princes and Popes sought his advice, and even the enemies of the Church admired the holiness of his life and the greatness of his writings.[5]

Spirituality[edit]

Stained glass representing Bernard. Upper Rhine, ca. 1450.

Bernard was instrumental in re-emphasizing the importance of lectio divina and contemplation on Scripture within the Cistercian order. Bernard had observed that when lectio divina was neglected monasticism suffered. Bernard considered lectio divina and contemplation guided by the Holy Spirit the keys to nourishing Christian spirituality.[27]

Bernard “noted centuries ago: the people who are their own spiritual directors have fools for disciples.”[28]

Legacy[edit]

Bernard’s theology and Mariology continue to be of major importance, particularly within the Cistercian and Trappist orders.[c]Bernard led to the foundation of 163 monasteries in different parts of Europe. At his death, they numbered 343. His influence led Alexander III to launch reforms that would lead to the establishment of canon law.[29] He was the first Cistercian monk placed on the calendar of saints and was canonized by Alexander III 18 January 1174. Pope Pius VIII bestowed on him the title “Doctor of the Church”. He is labeled the “Mellifluous Doctor” for his eloquence. Cistercians honour him as the founder of the order because of the widespread activity which he gave to the order.[11]

Saint Bernard’s “Prayer to the Shoulder Wound of Jesus” is often published in Catholic prayer books.

Bernard is Dante Alighieri‘s last guide, in Divine Comedy, as he travels through the Empyrean.[30] Dante’s choice appears to be based on Bernard’s contemplative mysticism, his devotion to Mary, and his reputation for eloquence.[31]

He is also the attributed author of the poems often translated in English hymnals as “O Sacred Head, Now Wounded” and “Jesus the Very Thought of Thee”.

Works[edit]

An engraving of The Lactation of Saint Bernard. The Virgin Mary is shooting milk into the eye of Saint Bernard of Clairvaux from her right breast which allegedly miraculously cured an eye affliction.

The modern critical edition is Sancti Bernardi opera (1957–1977), edited by Jean Leclercq.[32][d]

Bernard’s works include:

  • De gradibus humilitatis et superbiae [The steps of humility and pride] (in Latin). c. 1120. his first treatise.[33]
  • Apologia ad Guillelmum Sancti Theoderici Abbatem [Apology to William of St. Thierry] (in Latin). written in the defence of the Cistercians against the claims of the monks of Cluny.[34]
  • De conversione ad clericos sermo seu liber [On the conversion of clerics] (in Latin). 1122. A book addressed to the young ecclesiastics of Paris.[35]
  • De gratia et libero arbitrio [On grace and free choice] (in Latin). c. 1128. in which the Roman Catholic dogma of grace and free will was defended according to the principles of St Augustine.[36]
  • De diligendo Dei [On loving God] (in Latin). Outlines seven stages of ascent leading to union with God.[37]
  • Liber ad milites templi de laude novae militiae [In Praise of the new knighthood] (in Latin). 1129. addressed to Hugues de Payens, first Grand Master and Prior of Jerusalem. This is a eulogy of the Knights Templar order, which had been instituted in 1118, and an exhortation to the knights to conduct themselves with courage in their several stations.[38]
  • De praecepto et dispensatione libri [Book of precepts and dispensations] (in Latin). c. 1144. Answers questions about which parts of Rule of Saint Benedict an abbot can, or cannot, dispense.[39]
  • De consideratione [On consideration] (in Latin). c. 1150. Addressed to Pope Eugene III.[40]
  • Liber De vita et rebus gestis Sancti Malachiae Hiberniae Episcopi [The life and death of Saint Malachy, bishop of Ireland] (in Latin). [41]
  • De moribus et officio episcoporum (in Latin). A letter to Henri Sanglier, Archbishop of Sens on the duties of bishops.[42]

His sermons are also numerous:

  • Most famous are his Sermones super Cantica Canticorum (Sermons on the Song of Songs). Although it has at times been suggested that the sermon form is a rhetorical device in a set of works which were only ever designed to be read, since such finely polished and lengthy literary pieces could not accurately have been recorded by a monk while Bernard was preaching, recent scholarship has tended toward the theory that, although what exists in these texts was certainly the product of Bernard’s writing, they likely found their origins in sermons preached to the monks of Clairvaux.[e] Bernard began to write these in 1135 but died without completed the series, with 86 sermons complete. These sermons contain an autobiographical passage, sermon 26, mourning the death of his brother, Gerard.[43][44]After Bernard died, the English Cistercian Gilbert of Hoyland continued Bernard’s incomplete series of 86 sermons on the biblical Song of Songs. Gilbert wrote 47 sermons before he died in 1172, taking the series up to Chapter 5 of the Song of Songs. Another English Cistercian abbot, John of Ford, wrote another 120 sermons on the Song of Songs, so completing the Cistercian sermon-commentary on the book.
  • There are 125 surviving Sermones per annum (Sermons on the Liturgical Year).
  • There are also the Sermones de diversis (Sermons on Different Topics).
  • 547 letters survive.[45]

Many letters, treatises, and other works, falsely attributed to him survive, and are now referred to as works by pseudo-Bernard.[46]These include:

  • pseudo-Bernard (pseud. of Guigo I) (c. 1150). L’échelle du cloître [The scale of the cloister] (letter) (in French). [46]
  • pseudo-Bernard. Meditatio [Meditations] (in Latin). This was probably written at some point in the thirteenth century. It circulated extensively in the Middle Ages under Bernard’s name and was one of the most popular religious works of the later Middle Ages. Its theme is self-knowledge as the beginning of wisdom; it begins with the phrase “Many know much, but do not know themselves”.[47][48][46]
  • pseudo-Bernard. L’édification de la maison intérieure (in French).[46]

See also[edit]

Translations[edit]

  • On consideration, trans George Lewis, (Oxford, 1908) https://books.google.com/books?id=kkoJAQAAIAAJ
  • Select treatises of S. Bernard of Clairvaux: De diligendo Deo & De gradibus humilitatis et superbiae, (Cambridge: CUP, 1926)
  • On loving God, and selections from sermons, edited by Hugh Martin, (London: SCM Press, 1959) [reprinted as (Westport, CO: Greenwood Press, 1981)]
  • Cistercians and Cluniacs: St. Bernard’s Apologia to Abbot William, trans M Casey. Cistercian Fathers series no. 1, (Kalamazoo: Cistercian Publications, 1970)
  • The works of Bernard of Clairvaux. Vol.1, Treatises, 1, edited by M. Basil Pennington. Cistercian Fathers Series, no. 1. (Spencer, Mass.: Cistercian Publications, 1970) [contains the treatises Apologia to Abbot William and On Precept and Dispensation, and two shorter liturgical treatises]
  • Bernard of Clairvaux, On the Song of Songs, 4 vols, Cistercian Fathers series nos 4, 7, 31, 40, (Spencer, MA: Cistercian Publications, 1971–80)
  • Letter of Saint Bernard of Clairvaux on revision of Cistercian chant = Epistola S[ancti] Bernardi de revisione cantus Cisterciensis, edited and translated by Francis J. Guentner, (American Institute of Musicology, 1974)
  • Treatises II : The steps of humility and pride on loving God, Cistercian Fathers series no. 13, (Washington: Cistercian Publications, 1984)
  • Five books on consideration: advice to a Pope, translated by John D. Anderson & Elizabeth T. Kennan. Cistercian Fathers Series no. 37. (Kalamazoo, MI: Cistercian Publications, 1976)
  • The Works of Bernard of Clairvaux. Volume Seven, Treatises III: On Grace and free choice. In praise of the new knighthood, translated by Conrad Greenia. Cistercian Fathers Series no. 19, (Kalamazoo, Michigan: Cistercian Publications Inc, 1977)
  • The life and death of Saint Malachy, the Irishman translated and annotated by Robert T. Meyer, (Kalamazoo, Mich: Cistercian Publications, 1978)
  • Bernard of Clairvaux, Homiliae in laudibus Virginis Matris, in Magnificat: homilies in praise of the Blessed Virgin Mary translated by Marie-Bernard Saïd and Grace Perigo, Cistercian Fathers Series no. 18, (Kalamazoo, MI: Cistercian Publications, 1979)
  • Sermons on Conversion: on conversion, a sermon to clerics and Lenten sermons on the psalm “He Who Dwells”., Cistercian Fathers Series no. 25, (Kalamazoo, MI: Cistercian Publications, 1981)
  • Bernard of Clairvaux, Song of Solomon, translated by Samuel J. Eales, (Minneapolis, MN: Klock & Klock, 1984)
  • St. Bernard’s sermons on the Blessed Virgin Mary, translated from the original Latin by a priest of Mount Melleray, (Chumleigh: Augustine, 1984)
  • Bernard of Clairvaux, The twelve steps of humility and pride; and, On loving God, edited by Halcyon C. Backhouse, (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1985)
  • St. Bernard’s sermons on the Nativity, translated from the original Latin by a priest of Mount Melleray, (Devon: Augustine, 1985)
  • Bernard of Clairvaux : selected works, translation and foreword by G.R. Evans; introduction by Jean Leclercq; preface by Ewert H. Cousins, (New York: Paulist Press, 1987) [Contains the treatises On conversion, On the steps of humility and pride, On consideration, and On loving God; extracts from Sermons on The song of songs, and a selection of letters]
  • Conrad Rudolph, The ‘Things of Greater Importance’: Bernard of Clairvaux’s Apologia and the Medieval Attitude Toward Art, (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1990) [Includes the Apologia in both Leclercq’s Latin text and English translation]
  • Love without measure: extracts from the writings of St Bernard of Clairvaux, introduced and arranged by Paul Diemer, Cistercian studies series no. 127, (Kalamazoo, Mich. : Cistercian Publications, 1990)
  • Sermons for the summer season: liturgical sermons from Rogationtide and Pentecost, translated by Beverly Mayne Kienzle; additional translations by James Jarzembowski, (Kalamazoo, Mich: Cistercian Publications, 1991)
  • Bernard of Clairvaux, On loving God, Cistercian Fathers series no. 13B, (Kalamazoo, MI: Cistercian Publications, 1995)
  • Bernard of Clairvaux, The parables & the sentences, edited by Maureen M. O’Brien. Cistercian Fathers Series no. 55, (Kalamazoo, MI: Cistercian Publications, 2000)
  • Bernard of Clairvaux, On baptism and the office of bishops, on the conduct and office of bishops, on baptism and other questions: two letter-treatises, translated by Pauline Matarasso. Cistercian Fathers Series no. 67, (Kalamazoo, MI: Cistercian Publications, 2004)
  • Bernard of Clairvaux, Sermons for Advent and the Christmas seasontranslated by Irene Edmonds, Wendy Mary Beckett, Conrad Greenia; edited by John Leinenweber; introduction by Wim Verbaal. Cistercian Fathers Series no. 51, (Kalamazoo, MI: Cistercian Publications, 2007)
  • Bernard of Clairvaux, Sermons for Lent and the Easter Season, edited by John Leinenweber and Mark Scott, OCSO. Cistercian Fathers Series no. 52, (Kalamazoo, MI: Cistercian Publications, 2013)

Notes[edit]

  1. Jump up^ André de Montbard, one of the founders of the Knights Templar, was a half-brother of Bernard’s mother.
  2. Jump up^ Other mystics such as John of the Cross also found their language and symbols in Song of Songs.[9]
  3. Jump up^ His texts are prescribed readings in Cistercian congregations.
  4. Jump up^ For a research guide see McGuire (2013).
  5. Jump up^ For a history of the debate over the Sermons, and an attempted solution, see Leclercq, Jean. “Introduction”. In Walsh (1976), pp. vii–xxx.

Citations[edit]

  1. Jump up^ Smith, William (2010). Catholic Church Milestones: People and Events That Shaped the Institutional Church. Indianapolis: Left Coast. p. 32. ISBN 978-1-60844-821-0.
  2. Jump up^ Cristiani, Léon. St. Bernard of Clairvaux, 1090-1153. Translated by Bouchard, M. Angeline. Boston: St. Paul Editions. OCLC 2874038.
  3. Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i Gildas 1908.
  4. Jump up to:a b c d Bunson 1998, p. 129.
  5. Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i Pirlo 1997.
  6. Jump up^ McManners 1990, p. 204.
  7. Jump up^ “Expositio in Apocalypsim”Cambridge Digital Library(manuscript). Cambridge Digital Library. MS Mm.5.31. Retrieved 26 January 2016.
  8. Jump up^ Durant (1950) p.593.
  9. Jump up^ Cunningham & Egan 1996, p. 128.
  10. Jump up to:a b c Evans 2000, pp. 115–123.
  11. Jump up to:a b c d e Bunson 1998, p. 130.
  12. Jump up^ McManners 1990, p. 210.
  13. Jump up^ Alphandéry 1911, pp. 298–299.
  14. Jump up^ McManners 1990, p. 211.
  15. Jump up to:a b Riley-Smith 1991, p. 48.
  16. Jump up to:a b c Durant (1950) p.594.
  17. Jump up^ Ludlow 1896, pp. 164-167.
  18. Jump up^ Durant (1950) p. 391.
  19. Jump up^ Runciman 1952, pp. 232–4, 277.
  20. Jump up^ Allestree, Richard (1684). “Sermon | 13. | The Believers Concern | to pray for Faith. | Mark 9. 24. | Lord, I believe, help thou my Unbelief.Forty sermons, whereof twenty one are now first publish’d, the greatest part preach’d before the King and on solemn occasions. Oxford; London: for R. Scott, G. Wells, T. Sawbridge, R. Bentley. p. 188. OCLC 659408239. Retrieved 2015-02-23.
  21. Jump up^ James 1998, ep. 174.
  22. Jump up^ Most 1996.
  23. Jump up^ Lane, Anthony N. S. (1999). John Calvin: student of the church fathers. Edinburgh: T & T Clark. p. 100. ISBN 9780567086945.
  24. Jump up^ Calvin 1960, bk.3 ch.2 §25, bk.3 ch.12 §3.
  25. Jump up^ Luther 1930, p. 130.
  26. Jump up^ Calvin 1960, bk.3 ch.11 §22, bk.3 ch.25 §2.
  27. Jump up^ Cunningham & Egan 1996, pp. 91–92.
  28. Jump up^ Cunningham & Egan 1996, p. 21.
  29. Jump up^ Duffy 1997, p. 101.
  30. Jump up^ Paradiso, cantos XXXI–XXXIII
  31. Jump up^ Botterill 1994.
  32. Jump up^ SBOp.
  33. Jump up^ PL, 182, cols. 939–972c.
  34. Jump up^ PL, 182, cols. 893–918a.
  35. Jump up^ PL, 182, cols. 833–856d.
  36. Jump up^ PL, 182, cols. 999–1030a.
  37. Jump up^ PL, 182, cols. 971–1000b.
  38. Jump up^ PL, 182, cols. 917–940b.
  39. Jump up^ PL, 182, cols. 857–894c.
  40. Jump up^ PL, 182, cols. 727–808a.
  41. Jump up^ PL, 182, cols. 1073–1118a.
  42. Jump up^ Ep. 42 (PL, 182, cols. 807–834a).
  43. Jump up^ Verbaal 2004.
  44. Jump up^ PL, 183, cols. 785–1198A.
  45. Jump up^ SBOp v. 7–8.
  46. Jump up to:a b c d Gildas 1907.
  47. Jump up^ PL, 184, cols. 485–508.
  48. Jump up^ Bestul 2012, p. 164.

References[edit]

  • PD-icon.svg Alphandéry, Paul D. (1911). “Henry of Lausanne”. In Chisholm, Hugh. Encyclopædia Britannica13 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 298–299.
  • Bernard of Clairvaux (1976). On the Song of Songs II. Cistercian Fathers series. 7. Translated by Walsh, Kilian. Kalamazoo, MI: Cistercian Publications.OCLC 2621974.
  • Bernard of Clairvaux (1998). The letters of St Bernard of Clairvaux. Cistercian Fathers series. 62. Translated by James, Bruno Scott. Kalamazoo, MI: Cistercian Publications. ISBN 9780879071622.
  • Bernard of Clairvaux. Mabillon, Jean, ed. Opera omniaPatrologia Latina (in Latin). 182–185. Paris: Jacques Paul Migne. 6 tomes in 4 volumes.
  • Bernard of Clairvaux (1957–1977). Leclerq, Jean; Talbot, Charles H.; Rochais, Henri Marie, eds. Sancti Bernardi Opera (in Latin). 8 volumes in 9. Rome: Éditions cisterciennes. OCLC 654190630.
  • Bestul, Thomas H (2012). Meditatio/Meditation”. In Hollywood, Amy; Beckman, Patricia Z. The Cambridge Companion to Christian Mysticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521863650.
  • Botterill, Steven (1994). Dante and the Mystical Tradition: Bernard of Clairvaux in the Commedia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bunson, Matthew, Margaret, & Stephen (1998). Our Sunday Visitor’s Encyclopedia of Saints. Huntington: Our Sunday Visitor.
  • Calvin, John (1960). McNeill, John T., ed. Institutes of the Christian Religion1. Translated by Battles, Ford Lewis. Philadelphia: Westminster Press.OCLC 844778472.
  • Cantor, Norman (1994). The Civilization of the Middle Ages. New York: HarperPerennial. ISBN 0-06-092553-1.
  • Cunningham, Lawrence S.; Egan, Keith J. (1996). “Meditation and contemplation”Christian spirituality: themes from the tradition. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press.ISBN 978-0-8091-3660-5.
  • Duffy, Eamon (1997). Saints and Sinners, a History of the Popes.
  • Evans, Gillian R. (2000). Bernard of Clairvaux (Great Medieval Thinkers). Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-512525-8.
  • Wikisource-logo.svg Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). “Bernard, Saint“. Encyclopædia Britannica3 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 795–798.
  •  One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from a publication now in the public domainGildas, Marie (1907). “St. Bernard of Clairvaux“. In Herbermann, Charles. Catholic Encyclopedia2. New York: Robert Appleton.
  • Gilson, Etienne (1940). The mystical theology of St Bernard. London: Sheed & Ward.
  • Ludlow, James Meeker (1896). The Age of the Crusades. Ten epochs of church history. 6. New York: Christian Literature. OCLC 904364803.
  • Luther, Martin (1930). D. Martin Luthers Werke: kritische Gesammtausgabe (in German and Latin). 40. Weimar: Herman Böhlau.
  • McGuire, Brian Patrick (2013-09-30). “Bernard of Clairvaux”. oxfordbibliographies.com. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/OBO/9780195396584-0088.(subscription required (help)).
  • Mcmanners, John (1990). The Oxford Illustrated History of Christianity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-822928-3.
  • Most, William G. (1996). “Mary’s Immaculate Conception”ewtn.com. Irondale, AL: Eternal Word Television Network. Archived from the original on 1998-02-19. Retrieved 2015-02-23. Adapted from Most, William G. (1994). Our Lady in doctrine and devotion. Alexandria, VA: Notre Dame Institute Press. OCLC 855913595.
  • Pirlo, Paolo O. (1997). “St. Bernard”. My first book of saints. Sons of Holy Mary Immaculate – Quality Catholic Publications. pp. 186–188. ISBN 971-91595-4-5.
  • Riley-Smith, Jonathan (1991). The Atlas of the Crusades. New York: Facts on File. ISBN 0-8160-2186-4.
  • Runciman, Steven (1987). The Kingdom of Jerusalem and the Frankish East, 1100–1187. A History of the Crusades. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.ISBN 0-521-34771-8.
  • Verbaal, Wim (2004). “Preaching the dead from their graves: Bernard of Clairvaux’s Lament on his brother Gerard”. In Donavin, Georgiana; Nederman, Cary; Utz, Richard. Speculum sermonis: interdisciplinary reflections on the medieval sermon. Disputatio. 1. Turnhout: Brepols. pp. 113–139. doi:10.1484/M.DISPUT-EB.3.1616ISBN 9782503513393.