China’s Modern Martyrs: From Mao to Now (Part 3) – The Maoist era marks one of the darkest hours of the Church’s history in China

China’s Modern Martyrs: From Mao to Now (Part 3) – The Maoist era marks one of the darkest hours of the Church’s history in China

The Maoist era marks one of the darkest hours of the Church’s history in China, and Chinese Catholics are begging to let the world know about the sacrifices of holy men and women to retain their faith.


Our greatest success is not in never falling, but in rising again every time we fall.” — Confucius

bishop ignatius gong pinmei addressing the young catholics of shanghai shortly after he was ordained a bishop in 1949. courtesy of the society of jesus china province archive, taipei, taiwan.

In 1952, the young and energetic Catholic students of Shanghai addressed their bishop, Ignatius Gong Pinmei (1901-2000). “The battle demands sacrifices,” they asserted, “even if the battle and sacrifice were painful, the depth of the heart is filled with joy.”[1]For his part, Bishop Gong continued to encourage his flock to remain loyal to Christ and the Church as China’s new Communist government intensified its campaign to destroy the Catholic faith. China’s Catholic youth were undaunted. They composed a statement—written with a brush soaked in their own blood—in which they vowed their resistance to Communist pressure. “We have daily marched down a sure path in a set direction: we now maintain our position: steadfastly and resolutely Catholic, come what may.”[2]

dr. anthony clark with bishop wang chingyi at his cathedral residence. author’s private collection

China’s Catholic response to its new government was simple: resistance. The historical pattern for Catholics in China after Chairman Mao Zedong (1893-1976) became the “Great Helmsman” was straightforward; Communist persecution and Catholic resistance produced decades of suffering and martyrdom. Several years ago, during a visit to Guiyang’s magnificent cathedral, I met with Bishop Wang Chongyi (b. 1919). After sitting down beside him he told everyone to leave and close the door, and then he leaned over to whisper in my ear: “I was in prison during the Maoist era; I watched my fellow Catholics suffer. No one will ever know how many people were tortured and killed. I saw it. They were saints.” He asked me to tell their stories, and in this third installment of my series on Catholic martyrdom, “From Mao to Now” (Part One; Part Two), I will fulfill my promise to address Catholic suffering during the rule of Chairman Mao, from 1949 to 1976.

Mao’s media campaign and the wave of arrests

In Church Militant: Bishop Kung and Catholic Resistance in Communist Shanghai, his inspiring study of Catholic resistance in Shanghai, Father Paul Mariani, SJ, recounts the Party’s early strategies for confronting the presence of religion in China. Anti-Christian militants in the new, Communist China, “were not above using antireligion campaigns and terror…everything from burning churches to killing religious leaders.” [3] In one early Communist document related to the “religious problem” in China, it is affirmed: “Marxists are absolute atheists. We believe that religion is an impediment to the people’s awakening.”[4] What followed this assertion of the Party’s anti-Christian position was a sustained newspaper and poster crusade of slander and harassment against the Church.

anti-catholic newspaper cartoon from the jiefang ribao [liberation daily], 13 october 1951.

While researching for a new book, I spent some time at the Shanghai Municipal Library thumbing through copies of 1951 newspapers, and I discovered that anti-Catholic articles and cartoons were a national priority for Mao’s new regime. In one article, Catholic nuns were villainized as “baby killers”; in another, Catholics were accused of secret plots to overthrow the “People’s Government” while full-page features highlighted vitriolic cartoons depicting Catholics as “unpatriotic” and “imperialist agents.” In one cartoon, which appeared in the Jiefang ribao, 解放日報 or “Liberation Daily,” a European bishop is depicted with a banner of the Virgin Mary above the American and Korean armies, then considered the enemies of the Chinese people. The side caption reads: “The people resist America and support Korea’s patriotic movement—as they [Catholics] assert: ‘The Holy Mother watches above the American and Korean militaries.’” [5]Turning Catholic images and actions into iconic “enemies of the people” was common; in that cartoon, Mary, the Mother of God, is shown as the protectress of China’s rivals.

anti-catholic newspaper cartoon from the jiefang ribao [liberation daily], 12 october 1951.

In another cartoon, a Chinese priest, mistakenly depicted with the pectoral cross of a bishop, is shown being beaten out of a Catholic church by a massive fist with the words, “Patriotic Catholic,” 愛國天主教友 inscribed on his arm. He is accused of being a collaborator with “imperialist powers,” and his priestly habit is adorned with Nazi swastikas.[6]Such articles and cartoons were the first stage in a calculated operation to summon the people against Catholics, and these efforts were largely successful. Soon after their publication in the early 1950s, massive rallies of Socialist Youth marched through city streets with anti-Christian banners calling the government to suppress Catholic groups such as the Legion of Mary.

Prior to the peak era of Catholic martyrdom during the 1960s, the Party initiated a wide-scale arrest of Catholic clergy and hierarchy; as St. Mark wrote in his gospel, “I will strike the shepherd and the sheep shall be scattered.” [7] On September 9, 1955, Shanghai’s police were dispatched to raid and arrest priests and faithful at all the city’s Catholic parishes, schools, convents, and other Church-related properties. “They arrested Bishop Gong,” writes Msgr. Stephen DiGiovanni, “a number of priests and hundreds of lay Catholics.”[8]Immediately after the wave of arrests, the Catholic newspaper overseen—and controlled—by the local government, The Courier Dove, announced that Bishop Gong was detained for spreading “anti-revolutionary rumors with evil intent; sheltering anti-revolutionary elements in the cathedral and other places,” and for “praying to God for Catholics who had been condemned by the Communists.”[9] Any Catholic who had not denounced his loyalties to the pope, and who had not made his intentions clear to place the Party above his religion, was targeted as un-Chinese, counterrevolutionary, and unpatriotic. Bishop Gong and all other priests, nuns, and lay Catholics who did not follow this line were accused of undermining the people’s revolution under a subversive “cloak of religion.” Bishop Gong remained in prison for more than three decades; he was offered release if he denounced the pope, though he never did.

father zhang boda, sj at a shanghai event during the 1950s before his arrest and martyrdom. courtesy of the society of jesus china province archive, taipei, taiwan.

Conditions in Communist prison during the Maoist era were extreme for foreign priests, but much worse for native Chinese Catholics. Father John Casey, an Irish Columban missionary, was arrested in 1952 and suffered agonizing symptoms from maltreatment. In addition to recurring cases of dysentery, Father Casey contracted beriberi, one of the most painful diseases caused by malnutrition. “I experienced a swelling of the legs and severe jabbing nerve pains, especially at the joints, toes, and fingertips. Some of my toenails fell off.”[10] His sight began to fail and he frequently collapsed as he tried to stand. The Jesuit priest Zhang Boda, SJ (Beda Chang, 1905-1951) serves as an example of how much more intense the situation for Chinese Catholics was in Communist prison during the Maoist era. He was arrested on August 9, 1951 while playing chess with his fellow Jesuits in Shanghai. Father Jean Monsterleet, SJ recounts that Zhang was asked by Shanghai’s Communist authorities to “lead the ‘reformed’ Church of Shanghai,” and when he refused he was subjected to relentless torments.[11] During his interrogations, Father Zhang simply repeated, “Jesus, Mary, Joseph, save me!”[12] On October 30th, Father Zhang was transferred to a nearby hospital; his abuses were so severe that he had fallen into a coma, from which he died on November 11. When a Chinese priest went to retrieve the martyr’s body, he discovered that the “filthy, emaciated, naked and almost unrecognizable corpse had simply been flung down on the concrete floor on one of the rooms in the hospital.”[13] Local newspapers published creative slanders against Father Zhang’s character, and his death was falsely reported to have been caused by “apoplexy.”

Mao’s “Destroy the Four Olds” campaign

Bishop Wang Chongyi and many other Chinese Catholics have suggested that the most intense era of Catholic persecution and martyrdom was during the 10 years of Chairman Mao’s Cultural Revolution (1966-1976). Some accounts of church closure and destruction, anti-Christian attacks, torture, and martyrdoms have been already published, though most of the government-sponsored atrocities against Catholics in China remain “too sensitive” to discuss in China. Gerolamo Fazzini’s, The Red Book of Chinese Martyrs (Ignatius Press, 2009), has exposed several attempts by the Chinese government to repress—or erase—Catholicism in China, but this work, too, serves only as an introduction to the sweeping violence of the Cultural Revolution.

During a recent visit to Beijing, I returned to my favorite church there, Xishiku Church, 西什庫教堂, more famously known as North Church, 北堂. As I stood admiring the monumental façade, I noticed a groundskeeper giving particular attention to an area beside a nearby tree; it was as if he was attending to a sacred site. After I spent considerable effort to earn the man’s trust, he confided a stirring account of a Red Guard attack against an elderly priest on that very spot during the summer months of 1966. When a large crowd of teenage Red Guards, encouraged by Mao to confront and destroy the “Four Olds” (Old Customs, Old Culture, Old Habits, and Old Ideas), arrived at the church, an elderly Chinese priest met them near the church entrance. The priest was forced to kneel beside the church while his arms were contorted above his head in what was called the “airplane position”; in this painful state he was subjected to ridicule and commanded to denounce his religious belief. He refused. The Red Guards threatened to bury him alive if he did not apostatize. He still refused. The groundskeeper, a member of the North Church community, informed me that he was attending to the location where the old priest was buried alive by Chairman Mao’s radical Red Guards; events such as this were common during that era, and retelling them is still a risk.

photograph of a red guard attack against beijing’s south church in 1966. author’s private collection.


During the “10 year catastrophe,” as the Cultural Revolution is commonly called in China, Catholic churches were desecrated, destroyed, or seized by the government for secular use. During that time Beijing’s Catholic churches were all emptied and reused: North Church was used as a middle school; South Church was a processing factory; and West Church was a warehouse for Chinese herbs. While it is difficult to locate images of Red Guard attacks against Catholic churches, I have been able to acquire a few photographs taken during the most violent months of 1966. Two photographs taken in front of Beijing’s South Church show a characteristic Red Guard attack against a Catholic property. The church, which marks the original location of Matteo Ricci, SJ’s (1552-1610) chapel during the final years of the Ming dynasty (1368-1644), was emptied of all its religious objects (statues, art, relics, tabernacle, and so forth), which were gathered near the church façade and burned before a large crowd of radicals. In one photo we see a banner suspended from the church roof that reads, “Long live Chairman Mao!” (毛主席萬歲), while onlookers crowd around a rising flame. And in another image, Red Guards smile and laugh as they destroy statues of Jesus and Mary with hammers and clubs; the figure of Christ crucified lays headless among the broken statues. Another photograph taken in front of Tianjin’s Xikai Cathedral, 西開教堂, depicts images of Chairman Mao and anti-Catholic slogans pasted around the church’s front door. The tabernacle rests on the front steps as Red Guards burn and destroy sacred objects from the cathedral interior.

photograph of a red guard attack against beijing’s south church in 1966. author’s private collection.


More distressing than the destruction of churches during Mao’s Cultural Revolution were the arrests, beatings, and executions of Chinese Catholics. The story of Father Wang Shiwei, OFM (1910-1970) remains largely unknown outside China; he is among the countless Catholic martyrs who suffered cruelty and death while Chairman Mao orchestrated events from his Beijing residence. In an unpublished manuscript by Wang Jingshan, an elderly Catholic villager in central Shanxi, Father Wang’s suffering is outlined in bitter detail.[14]

father wang shiwei, ofm in the early 1960s, before his arrest and martyrdom in taiyuan, shanxi province. author’s private collection.

In the 1960s, all the Catholic bishops, priests, sisters, and seminarians around Taiyuan were summoned to an assembly at the city’s cathedral; the meeting was convened under the typical Maoist slogan, “Eradicate Religion” (消滅宗教), and during one of the sessions Father Wang exhorted the Catholics to “resist cowardice” and remain faithful. He was later arrested by large groups of Red Guards. They were merciless. “His prison was popularly called the ‘prison of death,’” writes the author of Father Wang’s biography; his feet and hands were shackled in chains so that he was unable to stand erect, and another chain linked his body to a beam above his head so that he could not lie down to sleep. He was restrained in this fashion in his prison cell for several years. In January 1969, Father Wang Shiwei was sentenced to death for defying the government and for resisting “intellectual reform”; in short, he refused to deny his Catholic beliefs and support Communism. On February 15, 1970, Wang was beaten in his prison cell, and then taken to a public stage where he was shot and killed.

Throughout the era of Mao’s “Destroy the Four Olds” campaign, during the first year of the Cultural Revolution, China’s Catholics were targeted as “enemies of the people.” Priests like Father Wang were ordered to trample on crosses while nearby Red Guards shouted, “Down with God!” Lian Xi describes this era forcefully: “Throughout the country, church leaders were dragged into public ‘struggle meetings’ to be humiliated or beaten; countless were sent to ‘cowsheds’ (improvised places of confinement for the ‘ox demons’) and labor camps or driven to suicide or apostasy.”[15] And as Vincent Goossaert and David Palmer have stated, “The Cultural Revolution produced the most thorough destruction of all forms of religious life in Chinese and, perhaps, human history.”[16]

Mao’s death and the softening of anti-Catholic programs

At 11:15 pm, on the evening of September 9, 1976, Chairman Mao Zedong drifted into a coma, and a few minutes after midnight the following day he passed away. One million people gathered later at Tiananmen to hear Mao’s successor, Hua Guofeng (1921-2008), who praised the chairman’s “great accomplishments.” He did not mention that among Mao’s accomplishments was the suffering and death of tens of millions of Chinese people from persecution and administrative policies; many of these people were Catholic Christians. Mao’s views on Christianity were never a mystery. In a speech he gave in 1939, he informed his comrades that “missionary work” was aimed at “duping the people,” and was an ally of “imperialist powers” that “poison the minds of the Chinese people.”[17] The Maoist era marks one of the darkest hours of the Church’s history in China, and I have been asked time and again by Chinese Catholics to tell others about the sacrifices that many holy men and women have made to retain their faith and witness to the love of Jesus Christ. “If prudence results in the loss of their memory,” they tell me, “then put prudence aside for the sake of the Church.”

On my desk I have a signed copy of a book written by Brother Peter Zhou Bangjiu, OSB, who now lives at St. Andrew’s Abbey in Valyermo, California. On August 1960, Communist officials tightened bronze handcuffs to his forearms, and because he refused to “reform,” they were left on his arms for four weeks. A photograph of his right arm reveals a permanently crippled hand—his arm is deformed from the maltreatment.[18] Brother Zhou was forced to remain in prison for 33 years because he refused to deny the Holy Father and would not openly approve the Communist government. After his long years in prison for the “crime” of being a Catholic monk, he composed a beautiful poem of gratitude: “Throughout an endless night, in a tenacious fight, I see the dawn at last” (漫長黑夜頑強戰鬥終見黎明).[19] As Bishop Wang Chongyi has recalled, many did not survive the “tenacious fight.”

In my next, and final, installment of “China’s Modern Martyrs: From Mao to Now,” I will trace the Church’s efforts to remain alive after Mao’s death. Many are surprised to learn that since the founding of the People’s Republic of China in 1949, the number of Chinese Catholics has grown by at least 10 million. This growth has occurred during an era of unrelenting persecution of Christian believers, both Catholic and Protestant. Chairman Mao’s expectation that China would “grow out of Christianity” was little more than wishful thinking; his attempts to eradicate the Church ironically resulted in its expansion. I shall turn to the post-Mao years in the next “Clark on China,” an era of growing freedom for Catholics, but also a time of continued harassment and anti-Christian discrimination.

Our Lady of Donglü

holy card image of our lady of donglü.

In 1900, a Vincentian priest named Father Wu prayed to the Virgin Mary, asking her to protect his community of Catholics at Donglü village from attacking Boxers. Traditional accounts assert that when the Boxers approached the village a “beautiful lady in white” appeared in the sky surrounded by a formation of lights. The Boxers shot their rifles at the emanation, but eventually fled in fear. The village was saved. In thanksgiving the priest commissioned the construction of a new shrine dedicated to Our Lady, and a painting of Mary wearing imperial robes (modeled, rather ironically, after an image of the Empress Dowager Cixi [1835-1908]) was to be displayed inside. During a 1925 synod held in Shanghai, the collected bishops decided to use the Donglü painting as the official image of “Our Lady of China,” and in 1932, Pope Pius XI (1867-1939) consecrated the village as an official Marian shrine for pilgrims. Devotion to Our Lady of Donglü, China sustained the faith of countless Catholics during the Maoist years of severe persecution, and after Mao’s death Chinese faithful restored the tradition of making annual processions to the Lady at Donglü, who had protected them through both the Boxer Uprising in 1900 and the Maoist era, from 1949 to 1976.

Procession of “underground” Catholics to Donglü village in 1995.

One hundred thousand Catholics from the unofficial community (“underground Catholics”) formed a long processional line in May 1995, carrying banners and praying the Rosary as they approached Donglü village. On May 23, more than 30,000 Catholics reported a miraculous vision as the priest began to offer Mass at the shrine. The sun was seen spinning from right to left, while various shades of light emanated from different areas in the sky. Some claimed to have seen the Our Lady of China image in the sky, the Virgin holding her Divine Child. The apparitions lasted around 20 minutes, and afterward the bishop of Baoding approved the vision as verifiable.

The following year, in 1996, the Chinese government was so exacerbated by the popularity of the Marian shrine at Donglü that it made illegal future pilgrimages to the village, and 5,000 troops were dispatched to the shrine to assure an end to the renewed Catholic devotion to this site. Accompanied by around 30 armored vehicles and military helicopters, the village was sealed off, the shrine was destroyed, and the local police confiscated all the statues and images of Mary. I have visited Chinese Catholics in several provinces and dioceses, and one of the recurring themes I hear from the Catholics I speak with after Mass is their sense of an antagonism between Mary and the current government. There were not many opportunities for pilgrimages to Marian shrines during the Maoist era; they were all closed. Now, however, even as churches are reopened and China’s Church continues to grow, the destruction of the Marian shrine at Donglü functions as a reminder that Catholic freedom is far from complete. When China’s bishops met in Shanghai in 1924, the pope’s apostolic delegate to China, Cardinal Celso Costantini (1878-1958), proposed that the synod fathers consecrate China to the Most Holy Virgin Mary. As Father Jeremy Clarke, SJ has describes this important event, “The consecration meant that the Church leaders were placing the needs, the hopes, and the prayers of their communities (and the whole of the Chinese people) at the feet of Mary in a special way, seeking her intercession and help.”[20] When Bishop Gong Pinmei faced a crowd of young Catholics as the Maoist era began, he told his flock to turn to Mary and the Rosary. This, he said, was how they would win their battle to survive, and this is how they are winning this battle still.


[1] Quoted in China Missionary Bulletin, Vol. IV (V), No. 3 (March 1952): 442-443.

Quoted in Msgr. Stephen M. DiGiovanni, Ignatius: The Life of Cardinal Kung Pin-Mei(Stamford, CT: Msgr. Stephen M. DiGiovanni, 2013), 34.

[3]Paul P. Mariani, Church Militant: Bishop Kung and Catholic Resistance in Communist Shanghai(Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011), 40.

[4] “Guanyu Tianzhujiao Jidujiao wenti de zhishi,” 關於天主教基督教問題的知識 [Concerning the Problem of Catholic and Protestant Christians], Shanghai Municipal Archives 上海市檔案館, B22-2-1. Quoted in Mariani, 39.

[5] Jiefang ribao, 解放日報 [Liberation Daily], Shanghai, 12 October 1951.

[6] Jiefang ribao, 解放日報 [Liberation Daily], Shanghai, 13 October 1951.

[7] Mark 14:27.

[8] DiGiovanni, 61.

[9] Quoted in China Missionary Bulletin, Vol. VII, No. 9 (November 1955): 821.

[10] John Casey, “Felon No. One,” in “. . . But Not Conquered,” Edited by Bernard T. Smyth (Westminster, MD: The Newman Press, 1958), 165.

[11] Jean Monsterleet, SJ, Martyrs in China, Transl. by Antonia Pakenham (Chicago: Henry Regnery, 1956), 61.

[12] Monsterleet, 16.

[13] Monsterleet, 16. For more on the martyrdom of Father Zhang Boda, see Jean Lefeuvre, SJ, Shanghaï: Les Enfente dans la Ville (Paris: Témoignage Chrétien, 1957), 92-99.

[14] A “draft manuscript” (初稿) of this booklet is retained in Yangquandao (Liuhecun) Village and is yet unpublished, as the nature of its narrative remains sensitive in Mainland China. See Wang Jingshan, 王靜山, Yu gaoge zhu : Wang (Leisi) Shiwei shengping xiaoji 獄高歌主:王(類思)世偉生平小記 [High Praise to God in Prison: A Small Record of the Whole Life of Wang (Leisi) Shiwei] (Liuhecun 六和村, Shanxi 山西, 2000).

[15] Lian Xi, Redeemed by Fire: The Rise of Popular Christianity in Modern China (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2010), 204.

[16] Vincent Goossaert and David A. Palmer, The Religious Question in Modern China (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011), 167.

[17] Mao Zedong, speech given December 1939, “The Chinese Revolution and the Chinese Communist Party,” Selected Works of Mao Tse-tung, Vol. II (Beijing: Foreign Languages Press, 1965), 312.

[18] Photographs of Brother Zhou’s crippled arms can be seen in the middle signature of his book. Brother Peter Zhou Bangjiu, OSB, Dawn Breaks in the East: One Spiritual Warrior’s Thirty-three Year Struggle in Defense of the Church (Maria Stein, OH: Serenity, 1992).

[19] Zhou Bangjiu, 110-111.

[20] Jeremy Clarke, SJ, “Our Lady of China: Marian Devotions and the Jesuits,” Studies in the Spirituality of Jesuits, 43/1 (Autumn 2009): 38-39.

About Anthony E. Clark, Ph.D. 41 Articles
Anthony E. Clark is an associate professor of Chinese history at Whitworth University and the author of China’s Saints: Catholic Martyrdom During the Qing, 1644-1911. He is also the host of the EWTN television series The Saints of China: Martyrs of the Middle Kingdom.

Read the source:

Please follow Romeo Hontiveros at Twitter click this link:


COMMENTARY: The chancellor of the Pontifical Academy of Science’s astonishing comments could be dismissed if they were not so damaging.

Article main image

“Right now, those who are best implementing the social doctrine of the Church are the Chinese,” stated Bishop Marcelo Sanchez Sorondo, the chancellor of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences. He had just returned from a trip to China.

In an interview published in the Feb. 2 Spanish edition of Vatican Insider, he extolled the Chinese government, stating: “I found an extraordinary China; what people do not know is that the central Chinese principle is ‘work, work, work.’ As Paul said: ‘He who does not work does not eat.’ You do not have shantytowns …”

The bishop went on to say that “China has defended the dignity of the human person.” In the area of the environment and climate change, China is “assuming a moral leadership that others have abandoned.  … China has evolved very well.”

Bishop Sorondo’s astonishing comments could be dismissed if they were not so damaging. Because they have caused widespread confusion and consternation, they require a response.

In stating that China is “the best at implementing the social doctrine of the Church,” has the bishop somehow forgotten that the social doctrine of the Church is founded upon belief in God? In contrast, the Chinese Communist Party is officially atheistic. It persecutes believers of all religions, including Christians, whether Protestant or Catholic.

In just the past couple of months, the Chinese government has demolished both Catholic and Protestant churches. It has torn down crosses, leaving “decapitated” churches in conformance with President Xi Jinping’s edict that all religions must be “Chinese without foreign influence.”

According to the Congressional-Executive Commission on China report, more than 2,000 crosses have now been torn down. In 2016, a pastor’s wife was buried alive taking a stand against bulldozers demolishing her church. God only knows how many Christians, including Catholics loyal to Rome, are suffering incarceration, forced labor and torture for their faith at this moment.

At a high-level conference on religion held in 2016, President Xi stated that all religious groups must “merge religious doctrines with Chinese culture, [as well as] abide by Chinese laws and regulations.” These laws and regulations restrict times and places of worship, the kind of literature that can be distributed, and whether minors can receive religious instruction.

In Zhejiang Province, it is reported that authorities have compelled all churches, including Catholic churches, “to install surveillance cameras for the purported purpose of “strengthening anti-terrorism efforts.” How does regarding Christian churches as potential terrorist cells conform to Catholic social doctrine?

Also absent from Bishop Sorondo’s comments is the current controversy over the fact that the Vatican has asked two legitimate bishops to step aside to make way for two “patriotic” bishops, hand-picked by the Chinese government. Cardinal Joseph Zen Ze-kiun, bishop emeritus of Hong Kong, has questioned whether Vatican officials making these decisions “know what true suffering is.”

Because it is officially atheistic, the Chinese Communist Party does not believe in God-given “inalienable rights.” Rather, it places itself as the ultimate power, with the authority to confer or dispense with human rights as it sees fit.

Contrary to Bishop Sorondo’s assessment, therefore, China has not “defended the dignity of the human person,” one of the primary social doctrines of the Church. The Chinese government has boasted of “preventing” 400 million lives through its one-child policy. In so doing, women have been forcibly aborted up to the ninth month of pregnancy. Some of these forced abortions have been so violent that the woman died, along with her full-term baby.

China has also sterilized hundreds of millions of women. Some of these forced sterilizations have butchered the women, destroying not only their reproductive health, but their overall health, as well. Gendercide, the sex-selective abortion of baby girls, remains in China.

It is a matter of public record that China’s human-rights record has not “evolved very well,” but in fact has deteriorated.

According to the heavily documented 2017 report of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China, under the two-child policy that in 2016 replaced the one-child policy, “officials continue to enforce compliance with population-planning targets using methods including heavy fines, job termination, arbitrary detention and coerced abortion.”

Because of the one-child policy, there is not enough of a young population to support the elderly. Many elderly are left destitute, and elder suicide in China is on the rise. And the 2017 death from liver cancer of 2010 Nobel Peace Prize winner Liu Xiaobo, who was serving an 11-year prison sentence for his pro-democracy efforts and was denied repeated requests to seek medical attention abroad, highlights the shameful treatment of political prisoners in China.

How is any of this consistent with respecting “life and the dignity of the human person” — a doctrine absolutely central to Catholic social teaching?

In brief response to several of Bishop Sorondo’s other statements:

  • Regarding the bishop’s lauding of the “work, work, work” ethic in China, does he not know of the appalling system of forced labor in China, providing the world with artificially inexpensive products?
  • Regarding the bishop’s statements that there are “no shantytowns,” is he not aware that, in 2014, more than 82 million Chinese were living on less than $1 a day? Is he aware of the intense suffering caused by grinding poverty in rural areas, where parents often have to leave their children in order to make money in another city?
  • Regarding the bishop’s statement that China is “assuming a moral leadership” in the area of environmentalism, is he uninformed that China’s air pollution has at times reached levels at which planes cannot land? Does he know that lung cancer is on the rise and that China’s air pollution is so bad that 29% of San Francisco’s pollution is estimated to come from China? It has similar problems with toxic water and soil.

Bishop Sorondo’s trip to China was no doubt tightly controlled and highly choreographed. His hosts likely did not inform him of any of the information outlined above. It is baffling, however, that the bishop would have taken this highly deceitful regime at its word, and then unwittingly served as a powerful mouthpiece to transmit their propaganda to the world.

Bishop Sorondo’s highly publicized praise of the Chinese government as the epitome of Catholic social teaching in action is a betrayal of faithful Chinese Catholics who are suffering severe persecution for their loyalty to Rome. His remarks can be used as a smoke screen by the Chinese government to cover those who are being crushed beneath the fist of this brutal, totalitarian regime. As a senior Vatican official, his comments are causing the Catholic Church to lose credibility.

According to Cardinal Joseph Zen, capitulation to the ever-increasing demands of the Chinese Communist Party only makes them clamp down harder on faithful Catholics. Regarding the attempt “to find mutual ground to bridge the decades-long divide between the Vatican and China,” Cardinal Zen asks, “But can there be anything really ‘mutual’ with a totalitarian regime?”

Appeasement diplomacy has never worked with China’s repressive regime. It will only serve as a smoke screen, beneath the cover of which they can continue and escalate their human-rights abuses. We would do better to obey the wise biblical command in Ephesians 5:11: “Have nothing to do with the fruitless deeds of darkness, but, rather, expose them.”

Reggie Littlejohn is the founder and president of Women’s Rights Without Frontiers. She is an internationally acclaimed authority on coercive population control in China.

 Read the source:

Please follow Romeo Hontiveros at Twitter click this link:

Related Articles/ Videos click below:

Pope Francis and the Cardinal Mindszenty Treatment in China

Cardinal Joseph Zen: ‘Vatican is ready to surrender to the Chinese communist party’



Bishop Marcelo Sanchez Sorondo Praise of China’s Adherence to Catholic Social Doctrine Flies in the Face of Facts

BISHOP MARCEL SANCHEZ SORONDO: CHINA BEST APPLIES SOCIAL DOCTRINE OF THE CHURCH – Communist China continues to brutally suppress Christianity and practice forced abortions, sterilizations



CHINA NOW TARGETS CATHOLICS: Catholic church becomes latest victim in China’s cross-removal campaign

CHINA PROVINCE BANS PRIESTS FROM HOSPITALS: Government steps up persecution of Catholics who cling to Rome

CHINA PROVINCE BANS PRIESTS FROM HOSPITALS: Government steps up persecution of Catholics who cling to Rome


China’s President Xi Jingping seeks more control over religion

China: Holy See Appeals for the Release of Bishop Shao of Wenzhou

China’s Modern Martyrs: From Mao to Now (Part 3) – The Maoist era marks one of the darkest hours of the Church’s history in China

The Catholic Church in China: What’s next?

Hong Kong Bishop John Cardinal Tong Writes on Communion of Church in China With Universal Church

The situation of the Catholic Church in China explained

Related Articles/ Videos click below:


Cardinal Joseph Zen: ‘Vatican is ready to surrender to the Chinese communist party’

Is Fascism Right Or Left?

POPE LEO XIII SIDES WITH TRUMP AGAINST SOCIALIST DEMOCRATS: “Socialists … strike at the interests of every wage-earner”

NORTH KOREA DEFECTOR CALLS COMMUNISM ‘HELL’: “Daily Caller” gets exclusive interview with Ji Seong-ho


Vatican II’s Unpublished Condemnations of Communism

Why socialism makes people selfish?

A Socialist Venezuela has a bread shortage: The government has decided bakers are the problem

Our Story – Venezuela’s Secret & 21st Century Socialism

Venezuela’s socialist hell

Venezuelan activists call for help in Vatican and Pope Francis calls for end to violence


Venezuelan government blasted for blocking Church aid

Venezuela’s Bishops Ask Leaders to Think of Their People



How Socialism Ruined My Country – Felipe Moura Brasil

The Man Who Knew Communism Best by Bishop Fulton J. Sheen

THE VORTEX: UNDERMINING THE CHURCH – Resisting and beating back the enemy

The Iron-Fisted Tyranny of Political Correctness

Democratic Socialism is Still Socialism – Steven Crowder

The Man Who Knew Communism Best by Bishop Fulton J. Sheen

Unmasking Saul Alinsky, a Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing 

CIA: (CCHD) Catholic Campaign for Human Development & Saul Alinsky 

Saul Alinsky and the IAF 

Millennials Should Read Solzhenitsyn: “Socialism of any type leads to the destruction of the human spirit”

Is Socialism Making a Comeback? – Despite Bernie Sanders’s best efforts, socialism is still as bad an idea as it ever was

TRUTH EXPOSED! Hitler was a Socialist…WATCH!

[Watch]Hitler Survivor Warns Americans: “Keep Your Guns And Buy More Guns” Don’t Listen To Commies

Socialism’s Bloody History Shows Millennials Should Think Twice Before Supporting It

Why socialism always fails?

Why Are Young People Cheering for Socialism?

What Do the Popes Truly Say About Socialism?

The True and False Meaning of “Social Justice”

Unmasking Saul Alinsky, a Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing

Love Your Enemy, But Know Him Too

New survey reveals that young Americans have little understanding of collectivism and its dark and deadly history

“GEORGE SOROS’ FORMULA FOR KILLING AMERICA” Watch the Viral Video that Exposes Soros’ Attack on the Church

A Populist Election and Its Aftermath

5 Reasons the Church Condemns Communism as “Intrinsically Wrong”

Fidel Castro’s War on Religion: From 1959 to 2006 the world’s longest-running Marxist dictator

Gloria Alvarez: Immigrants! Don’t Vote for What You Fled

The Catholic Church vs. Liberation Theology

“A theory that makes profit the exclusive norm and ultimate end of economic activity is morally unacceptable. The disordered desire for money cannot but produce perverse effects. It is one of the causes of the many conflicts which disturb the social order. A system that ‘subordinates the basic rights of individuals and of groups to the collective organization of production’ is contrary to human dignity. Every practice that reduces persons to nothing more than a means of profit enslaves man, leads to idolizing money, and contributes to the spread of atheism. ‘You cannot serve God and mammon’”(CCC: 2424).