Archbishop Auza: Arms, Wars Dim Hopes for Peace

Archbishop Auza: Arms, Wars Dim Hopes for Peace

Slow Treaty Progress Hurts Efforts to Halt North Korea

United Nations Headquarters in New York City

WIKIMEDIA COMMONS – Neptuul

Archbishop Bernardito Auza, Permanent Observer of the Holy See to the United Nations, said on October 10, 2017,  that the numerous violent conflicts throughout the world, the desperate situation of refugees, migrants and internally displaced persons, the scourge of terrorism, nuclear weapons, weapons of mass destruction, the proliferation of arms among non-state actors, and the use of cluster munitions and toxic chemicals against civilian populations all have dimmed the tremendous hopes that filled the world after the end of the Cold War.

His comments came during the First Committee General Debate of the 72nd Session of the United Nations General Assembly, in New York.

The Archbishop went on to say that the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, which the Holy See signed and ratified on September 20, is a step toward complete nuclear non-proliferation and disarmament; at the same time, the slow progress of other treaties, like the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty and the Treaty on Intermediate Nuclear Forces, frustrates efforts, for example, to persuade North Korea to end its nuclear arms program.

***

Archbishop Auza’ Statement Follows:

Mr. Chair,

My Delegation congratulates you and your associates on chairing this session of the First Committee of the General Assembly, and pledges its full cooperation in advancing our work.

At the outset, I want to extend my delegation’s heartfelt congratulations to the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) and to the many civil society organizations associated with it, for being awarded this year’s Nobel Peace Prize. My Delegation wish them every success in meeting the coming challenges.

The tremendous hopes for a better world generated by the end of the Cold War and by the liberation of many countries from totalitarian regimes have been dashed by the conflagration of numerous violent conflicts in many regions and countries in the world. They have been dimmed by the desperate situations of hundreds of millions of refugees, forced migrants and internally displaced persons. They have almost been snuffed out by extremely violent terrorist groups who act with utter disregard for every form of human decency.

The hopes for a more peaceful and secure world are severely threatened by the ever-increasing production of weapons and their great destructive firepower, including nuclear weapons and other weapons of mass destruction. The arms trade, both licit and illicit, keeps expanding. More and more countries have become arms manufacturers. The proliferation of arms, including weapons of mass destruction, among terrorist groups and other non-state actors has led to a most threatening situation.

These deeply disturbing trends increasingly threaten the existing architecture of arms control and non-proliferation, with the effect of rendering the ultimate objective of general and complete disarmament even more remote. They place greater obstacles and barriers to the achievement of peace and security, the full enjoyment of fundamental human rights, and an integral human development. These trends reveal that the chasm that separates commitments and action in the field of disarmament and arms control has been growing deeper and wider.

Mr. Chair,

The Holy See signed and ratified the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons during the 20 September signing ceremony, because it believes that it is an important contribution in the overall effort toward complete nuclear non-proliferation and nuclear disarmament, and a step  forward toward the fulfillment of the commitment of the States Party to the Treaty on Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) “to pursue negotiations in good faith on effective measures relating to cessation of the nuclear arms race at an early date and to nuclear disarmament.” The Treaty is one more step toward the fulfillment of the prophecy of Isaiah: “They shall beat their swords into plowshares and their spears into pruning hooks; One nation shall not raise the sword against another, nor shall they train for war again” (Isaiah 2:4).

The adoption of the Treaty shows that an overwhelming majority of States and many other stakeholders want swifter progress toward a world free of the threat of nuclear destruction. But while the Treaty constitutes a landmark in the field of global security, much work remains to be done if it is truly to make a difference and achieve its full promise, particularly in engaging the nuclear-weapon-possessing States and States under extended nuclear deterrence, and in establishing a competent international authority to oversee the dismantling of nuclear weapon systems. We must continue to pursue these objectives, and move toward general and complete disarmament under strict and effective international control.

We must not ignore, however, the halting pace of progress under other treaties, and the work needed to advance the objectives of NPT Article VI. The Holy See notes with concern the lack of movement to maintain existing agreements such as the Treaty on Intermediate Nuclear Forces or to bring into force the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT), with regard to which a Conference dedicated to attaining this objective has just taken place here on September 20.  It is difficult to envision further steps or establish additional building blocks in the edifice of nuclear arms control when an existing agreement is under duress, and the required ratifications to bring laboriously negotiated Treaties are not being sought.

In the context of the continued nuclear testing by the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, the Holy See reiterates its encouragement to those States whose ratifications are required for entry into force of the CTBT to act swiftly to ratify the Treaty, thereby making more credible and forceful all efforts to persuade North Korea to put an end to its nuclear arms program, and to convince it to ratify the CTBT. The disturbing developments on the Korean Peninsula demonstrate once again the importance of both the CTBT and the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, as well as all other efforts towards nuclear non-proliferation and nuclear disarmament.

In this regard, the Holy See welcomes the continued successful implementation of the New START Treaty between the Russian Federation and the United States of America, the recent high-level bilateral meeting in Helsinki and expert-level consultations to deal with nuclear arms control.  Likewise, the parties to the NPT are deeply engaged to ensure that the 2020 NPT Review Conference could achieve substantial results that eluded the 2015 NPT Review Conference. It is very much to be hoped that further steps toward nuclear disarmament will be acknowledged in the 202o NPT Review Conference.

At the same time, the use of cluster munitions and toxic chemicals against civilian populations has not stopped in spite of the Convention on Cluster Munitions and the Chemical Weapons Convention; indeed, this has been on the rise in some areas, as the not infrequent attacks against civilian populations demonstrate. Moreover, the risks that these deadly weapons fall into the hands of terrorists and radical non-state actors are real and present. We must therefore uphold the obligations established by these Treaties, to ensure that civilians everywhere are protected from these weapons which have catastrophic humanitarian impact and consequences.

Mr. Chair,

Last year, both this Committee and the General Assembly adopted by consensus Resolution 71/62, on the relationship between disarmament and development.  It is encouraging that this Committee has gone on record to stress “the importance of the symbiotic relationship between disarmament and development and the important role of security in this connection, and concern at increasing global military expenditure, which could otherwise be spent on development needs.”

The Resolution’s operative paragraphs are very much in line with the position of the Holy See, particularly with regard to devoting resources saved through disarmament and arms limitation agreements to economic and social development. In particular, Goal 16 of the Sustainable Development Goals underlines this “symbiotic relationship” between security and development. It aims to “promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels.”  This Committee has its work cut out for it in attaining this Goal.
Mr. Chair,

We live in momentous times. The Holy See thus fully supports the work of this Committee, and encourages it to be more determined than ever in working to achieve with ever-greater urgency and sense of purpose its ultimate objective of achieving a peaceful and stable world.

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Read the source: https://zenit.org/articles/archbishop-auza-arms-wars-dim-hopes-for-peace/

Archbishop Auza: Sustainable Means Integral

Recalls Pope’s call to “ecological conversion”

Archbishop Bernardito Auza ©Holy See Mission

Archbishop Bernardito Auza ©Holy See Mission

Sustainable development must be integral and go beyond economic growth to include the growth of the whole person and every person in the context of the community and environment, Archbishop Bernardito Auza, Permanent Observer of the Holy See to the United Nations, said October 10, 2017.

His comments came during the Second Committee debate on Agenda Item 19, dedicated to “Sustainable Development” at the UN in New York.

Sustainable development, he stated, must reject inordinate consumerism and individualism and affirm sustainable consumption and production. He called particular attention to the stresses that climatic changes can have on development and said that solidarity with those suffering from the consequent environmental catastrophes is required by justice. He repeated Pope Francis’ summons to “ecological conversion” and to intergenerational solidarity.

 

Archbishop Auza’s Remarks Follow:

Statement by H.E. Archbishop Bernardito Auza
Apostolic Nuncio and Permanent Observer of the Holy See
Seventy-second Session of the United Nations General Assembly, Second Committee
Agenda Item 19: Sustainable Development
New York, 10 October 2017
Mr. Chair,

My Delegation welcomes the Secretary-General’s recent reports on sustainable development. Building on the concept of integral human development, sustainable development moves beyond economic growth for its own sake. It looks, instead, to the development of the whole person and every person in the context of the community and the natural environment. Sustainable development requires sustainable consumption and sustainable production, linking people across global supply chains with everyone in the chain aware of the consequences of his or her actions on others in a global interdependent world. A rejection of excessive individualism and inordinate consumerisms at the center of our efforts to achieve the enjoyment of a decent life for all in a sustainable planet.

Mr. Chair,

It is becoming increasingly clear that the lack of environmental and economic sustainability is a major barrier to integral human development. The intensity and frequency of natural disasters strain resources and capacities of even the richest countries and quickly overwhelm and incapacitate smaller, less developed countries. Island States, in particular the Small Island Developing States, [1] have the added problem of access for rescue workers and aid supplies. The Holy See supports a renewed attention by the UN community to capacity building and other efforts to build resiliency for communities, especially in Small Island Developing States and the Least Developed Countries.

Sudden climatic changes can result in excessive rains in some areas, and drought and desertification in others. Africa has experienced severe drought and desertification, which has damaged lives and livelihoods, exacerbated ethnic and tribal conflicts and threatened its security, stability and sustainability.[2] Each year 12 million hectares, which is roughly the size of Nicaragua, is lost due to desertification.

Solidarity with our brothers and sisters suffering from the effects of environmental catastrophes is not a plea for charity; it is a call for justice. Much of the heightened risks, like rising sea levels and desertification, that poor and vulnerable States face are often provoked by causes for which they are not responsible. As Pope Francis notes in Laudato Si’: “A true ‘ecological debt’ exists, particularly between the global north and south, connected to commercial imbalances with effects on the environment, and the disproportionate use of natural resources by certain countries over long periods of time” (51).

Pope Francis calls us to an “ecological conversion” (Laudato Si’, 216). Problems related to sustainability cannot be solved by technology or aid alone, but require a more honest re-examination of our economic systems to make them work not only for the haves but also for the have-nots, and a change of personal and social lifestyles to better protect our common home. My Delegation is pleased to note that this need for a new relationship between humanity and the planet is also emphasized in the Secretary-General’s report on Harmony with Nature.[3]

Finally, my Delegation would like to underline the importance of intergenerational solidarity to attain sustainable development and long-term care for the environment. Pope Francis stated in Laudato Si’: “The notion of the common good also extends to future generations. … We can no longer speak of sustainable development apart from intergenerational solidarity. Once we start to think about the kind of world we are leaving to future generations, we look at things differently; we realize that the world is a gift which we have freely received and must share with others. Since the world has been given to us, we can no longer view reality in a purely utilitarian way, in which efficiency and productivity are entirely geared to our individual benefit. Intergenerational justice is not optional, but rather a basic question of justice, since the world we have received also belongs to those who will follow us” (159).
Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Read the source: https://zenit.org/articles/archbishop-auza-sustainable-means-integral/