The plot against Pope Francis: It is no secret in Rome that several cardinals want Francis to step down

The plot against Pope Francis: It is no secret in Rome that several cardinals want Francis to step down

On the first Saturday in February, the people of Rome awoke to find the city covered in peculiar posters depicting a scowling Pope Francis. Underneath were written the words:

Ah, Francis, you have intervened in Congregations, removed priests, decapitated the Order of Malta and the Franciscans of the Immaculate, ignored Cardinals… but where is your mercy?

The reference to mercy was a jibe that any Catholic could understand. Francis had just concluded his ‘Year of Mercy’, during which the church was instructed to reach out to sinners in a spirit of radical forgiveness. But it was also a year in which the Argentinian pontiff continued his policy of squashing his critics with theatrical contempt.

Before the Year of Mercy, he had removed (or ‘decapitated’) the leaders of the Franciscans of the Immaculate, apparently for their traditionalist sympathies. During it, he froze out senior churchmen who questioned his plans to allow divorced-and-remarried Catholics to receive Holy Communion. As the year finished, the papal axe fell on the Grand Master of the Knights of Malta, Fra’ Matthew Festing, who during an internal row over the alleged distribution of condoms by its charitable arm had robustly asserted the crusader order’s 800-year sovereignty. Francis seized control of the knights. They are sovereign no longer.

Damian Thompson and Dan Hitchens discuss the plot against Pope Francis:

So the sarcasm of asking the Pope about his ‘mercy’ is pretty obvious. But Italians noticed something else. ‘A France’… ma n’do sta la tua misericordia?’ is local dialect — the Romanesco slang in which citizens taunted corrupt or tyrannical popes before the fall of the Papal States in 1870.

Although the stunt made headlines around the world, it is unlikely to have unnerved the Pope. There is a touch of the Peronist street-fighter about Jorge Bergoglio. As his fellow Argentinian Jesuits know only too well, he is relaxed about making enemies so long as he is confident that he has the upper hand. The posters convey impotent rage: they are unlikely to carry the fingerprints of senior churchmen.

In any case, it is not anonymous mockery that should worry the Pope: it is the public silence of cardinals and bishops who, in the early days of his pontificate, missed no opportunity to cheer him on.

The silence is ominous because it comes amid suspicion that influential cardinals are plotting against Francis — motivated not by partisan malice, but by fear that the integrity and authority of the papacy is at stake.

Antonio Socci, a leading conservative Vatican-watcher, says that cardinals once loyal to Francis are so concerned about a schism that they are planning to appeal to him to step down. He predicts that the rebellion will be led by about a dozen moderate cardinals who work in the curia.

Their favoured candidate is understood to be Cardinal Pietro Parolin, a veteran diplomat who serves as the Pope’s secretary of state, a post that combines the duties of prime minister and foreign secretary. Parolin is unusually powerful because the Pope indulges him. Power has drained from other Vatican departments towards the secretariat of state. It is Parolin who is pushing the church towards an accommodation with Beijing that, critics say, would betray faithful Chinese Catholics; it was also Parolin who moved against the leadership of the Order of Malta, which had sacked one of his well-connected friends.

The argument for replacing Francis with Parolin rests on the latter’s administrative skills: unlike the current Pope, he is not given to wildly impulsive decisions which he then reverses without bothering to tell anyone.

But even if a group of cardinals are determined to elevate Parolin, what chance do they have of succeeding? It’s true that when Pope Benedict resigned, he created an extraordinary precedent: that popes can choose to stand down. But to nudge an unwilling pope over the edge would be a tall order, even by the standards of today’s Vatican skulduggery.

If, however, we remove the fanciful speculation, we are left with a real story. It is no secret in Rome that certain cardinals who voted for Francis are now worried that he is leading the church towards schism, and that he must therefore be stopped. There are many more than a dozen of them and, though they may not yet be ready to act upon their concerns, they would like this pontificate to end sooner rather than later.

The stakes are so high because the discontent is not fundamentally about personality: it arises from an argument about the central tenets of the faith.

In the end, it all boils down to the question of giving communion to people who are either divorced and remarried or married to a divorced person.

Non-Catholics, and indeed many Catholics, find it hard to understand why this is such a big deal. Put simply, the Catholic church is the only worldwide Christian denomination that takes literally the parts of the Bible (Luke 16:8, Mark 10:11, Matthew 19:9) where Jesus says that divorced and remarried people are committing adultery. This isn’t to say that church authorities haven’t hypocritically (or compassionately) bent the rules down the centuries — but the teaching has remained unchanged.

Until now, anyway. In April last year, Pope Francis released Amoris Laetitia, (‘The Joy of Love’), a 200-page document in response to a synod of the world’s bishops that had rejected any change to the teaching that Catholics in irregular marriages should not receive communion.

To cut a long story short, Francis appeared to go along with the synod’s wishes. But a footnote in Amoris Laetitia hinted (and it was just a hint) that couples, in consultation with a priest, could decide for themselves whether to receive the sacrament.

A few progressive cardinals and bishops — most significantly in Germany, where Catholicism looks an awful lot like liberal Protestantism — seized on this footnote and declared that divorced-and-remarried couples could have communion if their consciences were clear.

Whereupon countless cardinals, bishops, priests and canon lawyers said, no they can’t. But Francis, without going on the record, let it be known that yes they can — in his opinion, anyway. And he’s the Pope. So please would bishops everywhere start falling into line and support a more liberal stance on communion for the remarried, even though he has never formally articulated it?

A split like this over the meaning of marriage threatens to do to the Catholic church what the issue of homosexuality has done to the Anglican communion: creating rifts between liberals and conservatives and dividing the church in the West against the church in the developing world.

To a great many in Rome, it looks as if the Pope is single-handedly ripping apart church teaching — in defiance of his own hierarchy. ‘It’s utterly bizarre. He’s actually been ringing round asking for support on this,’ says a priest in the Vatican. Like an American president lobbying senators? ‘Exactly. But he’s not getting the answers he wanted. Instead, there’s this silence that has not greeted any other papal exhortation I can think of.’

Why the silence? The answer is that the Pope has put cardinals and bishops in an impossible situation.

Consider the case of England and Wales. Cardinal Vincent Nichols, president of the bishops’ conference, could not issue a set of German-style ‘anything goes on divorce’ guidelines even if he wanted to (and no one knows what the inscrutable Nichols really wants, except perhaps to be Pope himself).

The conservative Bishop Philip Egan of Portsmouth has already said that there will be no change of pastoral practice in his diocese, full stop. Nichols couldn’t even sell relaxed guidelines to his own Westminster diocese: at least one of his bishops would rebel.

This dilemma is being replicated all over the world. Two thirds of diocesan bishops either believe that the Pope is monkeying with the fundamentals of Christian doctrine or, taking a more lenient view, think his misguided compassion has created pastoral chaos. And the chaos will persist for as long as this man is Pope.

Which is why — despite various efforts to cast Francis in the role of ‘great reformer’ squaring up to satin-clad dinosaurs — moderate cardinals are ready for a new pope who can kick this wretched issue into the long grass.

But how can this be achieved? The moderates aren’t keen to join forces with anti-Francis conservatives, who are already, as those posters showed, taking resistance to extraordinary lengths.

At the end of this month, the University of Paris-Sud is hosting a conference on ‘the canonical problem of the deposition of heretical popes’. The organisers are not openly suggesting that Francis falls into this category, but others may draw their own conclusions. Two of the professors giving papers have asked the Pope to rule against ‘heretical’ misunderstandings of Amoris Laetitia — which he refuses to do. So some of the theoretical discussions of deposing popes may be rather pointed.

But can Francis really be forced out of office by canon law? Moderate cardinals wouldn’t countenance it even if it were possible. That leaves what Socci calls ‘moral suasion’, otherwise known as arm-twisting. Several cardinals believe that this is what happened to Benedict XVI, though the pope emeritus insists that the decision to resign was his alone. Benedict, a theologian, grew to hate being pope. Francis, by contrast, loves it so much that he hasn’t taken a holiday since walking on to the balcony of St Peter’s. That doesn’t mean that no one will try to persuade Francis to step down, but God help them when they do.

This leaves the Catholic church in deadlock. To quote one Vatican employee, ‘Liberal or conservative, what most cardinals want is release from the endless fatigue created by Francis.’

The plotting will go on, of course: some clerical politicians can’t stop themselves. So will the papal lobbying, but it is unlikely to bear fruit. And the longer the deadlock lasts, the angrier and more outspoken Francis will become. Which leaves the Vatican in the worst possible situation: a plot against the Pope that is an open secret, but which has little chance of success.

The word ‘Catholic’ means universal — yet now local tension between the liberal and conservative strands of the faith is intensifying, and is being made worse by the Pope himself. Many priests have absolutely no intention of giving communion to couples in irregular marriages. So the couples are left wondering who is right: their priest or their Pope? The conditions for a schism are there, for those with an eye to see them.

Read the source:

Left to right, top then bottom: Cardinals Raymond Burke, Joachim Meisner, Walter Brandmüller and Carlo CaffarraLifeSite

By Pete Baklinski and Claire Chretien, Thu Mar 9, 2017 – 10:00 am EST

Updated: The full list of Catholic bishops and cardinals ‘for and against’ the dubia

Update March 10, 2017: Archbishop Tomash Peta, Archbishop Jan Pawel Lenga, and Cardinal Wim Eijk support. Cardinal Donald Wuerl and Cardinal Orlando Quevedo oppose. 

Editor’s Note: LifeSiteNews brings you a list of bishops and cardinals who have publicly indicated their support or opposition to the September 2016 “dubia” submitted to Pope Francis by the four cardinals. This list includes high-ranking prelates whose comments relate directly to the dubia after their public release on November 14, 2016. The list does not include prelates who have merely made statements supporting or opposing the writings, decisions, and actions of Pope Francis, but haven’t commented directly on the dubia. The list will be updated. 

Cardinals who signed the dubia

Cardinal Walter Brandmüller

Cardinal Raymond Burke

Cardinal Carlo Caffarra

Cardinal Joachim Meisner

READ: Who are these four cardinals who wrote the ‘dubia’ to the Pope?

Bishops and cardinals who support the dubia

Updated March 10, 2017 with Peta, Lenga, and Eijk.

Archbishop Luigi Negri: March 06, 2017 – “Amoris Laetitia needs clarification, unfortunately, the current leader of the Church still remains silent. […] I think that the Holy Father should respond.”

Archbishop Charles J. Chaput: March 03, 2017 – John Allen: “Do you want the pope to answer the dubia?” Chaput: “Yes. I think it’s always good to answer questions, clearly.”

Cardinal Joseph Zen: February 16, 2017 – “It is a very respectful request by those bishops and cardinals to have a clear statement. I think they are right to have an answer.”

Archbishop Tomash Peta: January 18, 2017 – “Only the voice of the Supreme Pastor of the Church can definitively impede a situation where […] the Church […] has in practice accepted divorce.”

Archbishop Jan Pawel Lenga: January 18, 2017 – “We are forced to make this urgent appeal to prayer” given the “ineffectiveness of numerous appeals made privately and in a discreet manner to Pope Francis both by many faithful and by some Shepherds of the Church.”

Cardinal Wim Eijk: December 23, 2016 – “You cannot change doctrine with footnotes or a loose statement in an airplane interview. I would like [Amoris] to be clarified. […] Prolonged lack of clarity may result in undesirable practices to arise.”

Bishop Andreas Laun: December 23, 2016 – “I have read the concerns of the four cardinals, and I agree with them!”

Cardinal Renato Raffaele Martino: December 16, 2016 – “It is legitimate in terms of doctrine to turn to the pope and express an opinion – and it is also just that he would respond.”

Cardinal Paul Josef Cordes: December 12, 2016 – “With an objective tone, the four cardinals have asked for the removal of doubts about the text [Amoris Laetitia].”

Bishop James D. Conley: December 5, 2016 – “The questions being posed to the Holy Father are intended to help achieve clarity.”

Cardinal George Pell: November 29, 2016 – “How can you disagree with a question?”

Bishop Athanasius Schneider: November 23, 2016 – “The four cardinals only did their basic duty as bishops and cardinals.”

Bishop Jan Watroba: November 23, 2016 – “I myself have now been overwhelmed with many similar questions.”

Bishop Józef Wróbel: November 22, 2016 –  “The four cardinals did well in asking for clarification about Amoris Laetitia.”

Bishops and cardinals who oppose the dubia

Updated March 10, 2017 with Wuerl and Quevedo.  

Cardinal Vincent Nichols: February 23, 2017 – “I think the Pope’s patience and reserve about this whole matter is exactly what we should observe.”

Cardinal Donald Wuerl: January 30, 2017 – “A very small number of people, whose voices have been amplified by some of the Catholic media, have challenged the integrity of Pope Francis’ post-synodal apostolic exhortation, Amoris Laetitia […] It seems that a part of the distress evident in what has been described as a ‘tempest in a teapot’ is the fact that Pope Francis is challenging all of us to move into a far more Gospel-identified mode of living and being Church than we may have been comfortable with.”

Cardinal Orlando Quevedo: January 19, 2017 – “It’s clear enough that the Pope is holding on to doctrine [in Amoris]. I cannot understand the justification that the pope has to clarify his position. [Challenging the Pope is] divisive of the Church.”

Cardinal Gerhard Müller: January 8, 2017 – “The Pope is basically forced to answer with ‘yes or no.’ I don’t like that.”

Cardinal Walter Kasper: December 22, 2016Amoris Laetitia is “clear. … These dubia … do not exist.”

Cardinal Reinhard Marx: December 21, 2016 – “The document [Amoris] is not as ambiguous as some people claim.”

Cardinal Fernando Sebastian Aguilar: December 11, 2016 – “Some honorable men suffer because they do not understand what Francis wanted to say in Amoris Laetitia.”

Archbishop Mark Coleridge: December 9, 2016 – Pope Francis “wants a genuine clarity” while the four cardinals are seeking a “false clarity.”

Monsignor Pio Vito Pinto: December 1, 2016 – “They gave the Pope a slap in the face.”

Cardinal Wilfrid Fox Napier: November 30, 2016 – “Jesus also chose not to answer certain questions.”

Cardinal Claudio Hummes: November 25, 2016 – “We are 200, they are only four.”

Bishop Frangiskos Papamanolis: November 20, 2016 – They have committed the “two very serious sins” of “apostasy” and “scandal.”

Cardinal Blase Cupich: November 19, 2016 – “It’s up to those who have doubts and questions to have conversion in their lives.”

Cardinal Joseph Tobin: November 18, 2016 – “Just to simply reduce [Amoris] to a ‘dubium’, I think it is at best naive.”

Cardinal Christoph Schönborn: November 18, 2016 – This is an “attack against the pope.” The cardinals “must be obedient to the pope.”


Cardinal Angelo Amato: November 24, 2016 – “The debate must be continued in reciprocal respect and above all by using the talents of the respective positions [in order to arrive at a] more integrated and improved positions.”

Note to readers: Send tips with links to evidence of cardinals and bishops who support or oppose the dubia to Pete Baklinski, [email protected].

Read the source:

Related Articles/ Videos click below:

POPE FRANCIS: NO COMMUNION FOR DIVORCED AND REMARRIED – Papal clarification sheds light on hot-button topic arising from latest exhortation “Amoris Laetitia”

Cardinal Gerhard Müller: Bishops should not give ‘contradictory interpretations’ of doctrine

The Church is now in a full-blown civil war over doctrine

‘It gives the feeling of a schism’: EWTN panel analyzes current ‘disaster’ in the Church  by Amoris Laetitia


Vatican doctrine chief Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller rebukes bishops using Amoris to justify ‘mortal sin’ of adultery

What History May Tell Us About Amoris Laetitia?

Global priests’ movement urges Pope Francis to answer 4 Cardinals: ‘A clarification is clearly needed’

Maltese Catholics rebuke ‘abominable’ Communion guidelines in stinging full-page ad


Catholic Teaching on Marriage and Communion is Unambiguous

Cardinal Burke Corrects Errors of Papal Defenders; De Mattei Sets Historical Stage for Confrontation



Updated: Who are these four cardinals who wrote the ‘dubia’ to the Pope?



Pope Francis: Everything in Amoris Laetitia was supported by the synod

CARDINAL GERHARD MÜLLER AFFIRMS CHURCH TEACHING ON MARRIAGE: “Amoris Laetitia” must be read in light of traditional doctrine and discipline

San Diego Bishop Robert McElroy to priests: Embrace ‘LGBT families’, give Communion to ‘remarried’

Vatican Chief of Sacraments: No pope can change divine law on Communion


Staunch Dubia Opponent Msgr. Pio Vito Pinto on Famous List of Freemasons and who redoubles his rebuke of the four Cardinals

Amoris Laetitia: The Controversies Explained

Time to choose sides in the civil war over Amoris Laetitia says Catholic academic


Church Leaders Respond to the ‘Dubia’



African Cardinal Wilfrid Napier: If we allow Communion for adulterers, what about our polygamists?


Pope Francis encourages the integration of the divorced in the Church: Apostolic Exhortation Amoris Laetitia (Latin for ‘Joy of Love’) was presented



Defenses of Pope Francis’ Apostolic Exhortation “Amoris Laetitia”

What has Pope Francis given us in “Amoris Laetitia”?

VIDEO — Cardinal Christoph Schönborn: ‘Amoris Laetitia’ Needs Serious Theological Discussion

Amoris Laetitia: All Things to All Men

Father Spadaro: Amoris Laetitia Is a Jesuit Document




The Family Synod’s Final Report is Out in English, and It’s Remarkably Strong

Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI breaks silence: speaks of ‘deep crisis’ facing Church post-Vatican II

Cardinal Robert Sarah: “God is disappearing from society… no one is interested in God”

Mic’d Up – Family Synod Aftermath, Part 1

Mic’d Up: Eurocentrism – Family Synod Aftermath, Part II

The Worthy Reception of the Eucharist Neglected at the Family Synod

Pope Francis celebrates Mass to mark the end of the Synod on the Family & Top 7 Proposals

Bishop Athanasius Schneider reaction to Family Synod: Door to communion for divorced and remarried officially kicked open

Family Synod Speaker Dr. Anca-Maria Cernea: Don’t fear media attacks

The Vortex: Benedict’s Fingerprints

Unclear Final Family Synod Document leads to disagreement and division

Pope Francis: Synod was about affirming family, indissoluble marriage

Pope Francis addresses Synod of Bishops on the Family at Conclusion

As Family Synod closes, Pope Francis reminds ‘Jesus believes in us than we believe in ourselves’

Pope Francis’ Homily at Closing Mass of Synod on the Family

Pope Francis’ Angelus Address at St. Peter’s Square on Family Synod 2015

Conclusion of the Family Synod 2015: Cardinals and Bishops reacts

Family Synod 2015 Concludes: The latest on the conclusion of the 2015 Synod on the Family

Breaking: Final Family Synod 2015 Showdown Report

Final Relatio 2015 on the Family Synod: An opening for communion to divorced and remarried

Final Relatio 2015 on the Family: Gay propaganda absent

Synod on the Family also looks into persecution of families by ISIS

Analysis: Christians oppressed for their faith by the Islamic Groups

Cardinal Daniel DiNardo: The Church needs to do a better job forming faithful families

Cardinals: The family Synod document expresses the consensus of great majority of the assembly

Pope Francis creates new dicastery for the family

Cardinal Oswald Gracias sheds light on the final stage of the Synod on the Family

Ten Bishops have final say on Family Synod Document

Misleading language in Synod Reports

Family Synod Father: Certain proposals were ‘artificially conceived to destroy the family’

Bishop Athanasius Schneider: Family Synod seems to push anti-family agenda

The Vortex: Listening Closely

Archbishop Charles Chaput: Shelve ‘intrinsically disordered’ in reference to homosexuality

Archbishop Oswald Gomez emphasizes unity of doctrine and practice

Pope Francis is now effectively at war with the Vatican

Is the Synodal Church a Gnostic Church?

Pope Francis seeks ‘healthy decentralization’

Cardinal George Pell rejects ‘continental Catholicism’

Cardinal Wilfrid Napier drops bomb on political correctness

Cardinal Wilfrid Napier on the Synod: Things are different this time around

Cardinal Urosa: ‘The moral teaching of the Church is the same everywhere’

Denver Archbishop Samuel Aquila: Would German Bishops side with Henry VIII or Thomas More?

Archbishop Samuel Aquila: ‘Kasper Proposal’ would undermine sacrifices of Sts. Fisher & More

Archbishop Gadecki: Gender Ideology is worse than Marxism

Lay Doctor warns Synod Fathers about ‘Cultural Marxism’

Archbishop Gadecki: Reducing Theology to Sociology has no future

Archbishop Blase Cupich and the Catholic Conscience

Video: Cardinal Francis Arinze – People in objectively sinful situation can’t receive communion in ‘good conscience’

Cardinal Raymond Burke to Jesuit: Pope can’t change truth

Polish Archbishop Gadecki: Unless we recognize sin, Christ’s incarnation is meaningless

Archbishop Stanislaw Gadecki Sunday Family Synod Intervention

In fact, the decision to admit them to Holy Communion would open the door to this sacrament for all who live in mortal sin. This in turn would lead to the elimination of the Sacrament of Penance and distort the significance of living in the state of sanctifying grace. Moreover, it must be noted that the Church cannot accept the so-called “gradualness of the law” (John Paul II,