An Open Letter to Planned Parenthood: Discussing fetal body parts over lunch
BY EMILY BRANDENBURG 07/20/2015
Dear Planned Parenthood,
We don’t care about your labels.
After the surfacing of an undercover video showing a director of yours discussing fetal body parts over lunch, you’ve mutated it into a debate about labels. In your official statement in response to the undercover video, you apologize for a lack of “compassion.” But, your word choice is telling.
You say they aren’t “body parts,” just “tissue.” And, you aren’t “selling” the tissue, just “donating” it. You claim you are simply collecting “actual costs,” not incurring a “financial benefit” from the transactions.
Why all this meticulousness over labels?
This is due to the fact that the whole legality of your actions in the video hinges on whether they fit within these labels. If you are just “donating” and receiving “reasonable payments” for the tissue, your actions may be legal. However, if you are “selling” or “receiving a profit,” then your actions may violate the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003 and other federal law.
But, perhaps your biggest failure is to ask the most important question—is it right? In the midst of your legalese flurry, you’ve overlooked the bigger picture. Putting laws aside, should we as a society be doing this?
It is barbaric. All things legal aside, dismembering children by extracting their hearts, livers, and lungs is Nazi-like—whether they are donated or sold. Crushing the skulls of living children in the womb is inhumane—whether you collect actual costs or incur a financial benefit. “Donating” or “selling” human body parts, or whatever label we want to slap on it, is desecrating human life. It is objectifying the most innocent members of society—those who have no voice.
And, this is why we are outraged. We don’t care what the labels are. We don’t care if it’s legal after your assiduous labels render it such.
We don’t want to argue the transitory parameters between “selling” and “donating.” We don’t want to exploit the boundaries between “reasonable payments” and “profits.” We don’t want to parse words and politicize legal verbiage all under the name of “science.”
We don’t care how so-called progressive interpretations of legal jargon adjudicate fickle definitions of morality. In our gut, we are abhorred. We are disgusted. We know deep down that no matter what label legal contortionists slap on it, it is inherently wrong.
We don’t care if the “tone” of your director was not “compassionate.”
We don’t care about labels. But, we do care about one thing. We care about the dignity of human life.
Instead of launching into a probe of the “ethical editing” of the videographers, why don’t we investigate the ethical ramifications of dismembering aborted children for science? Instead of coining body parts “tissue,” how about we call it what it really is—a child? Instead of placing value on a child’s body parts after an abortion, how about we place value on the child’s life?
Instead of apologizing “for the staff member’s tone and statements,” why not apologize for objectifying a child’s body parts? Instead of apologizing for a lack of “compassion” in the way the remarks were given, why not apologize for a lack of compassion for the unborn?
Instead of fretting over labels, let’s fret over our legacy.
What will our legacy be? We launch spacecraft into the beyond in search for the smallest cell we can dub “life,” yet annihilate the skulls of those in the womb. We are concerned about a lack of compassion in the tone of your director’s statements, but overlook the compassion given to the unborn.
In our age of technological advances, we now know that life begins at conception. We should know better—especially when the life is more than a lump of cells and has human body parts in the form of hearts, lungs, livers, and skulls. Tissue is not body parts.
We can exhaust the labels all we like, but the fact remains the same—we are killing and dismembering human beings in genocide proportions.
It is easy for us to justify our actions in the myopic and instant age of iPhones and Facebook newsfeeds where marketing firms can slap labels on something and everything is OK. But, history isn’t as forgiving.
So, let’s ditch the labels. Let’s stop the elusive and impotent attempts to categorize actions under the guise of legality and science. Instead, let’s do what’s right.
Read the source & comments: http://www.ncregister.com/blog/ebrandenburg/instead-of-fretting-over-labels-lets-fret-over-our-legacy
About Emily Brandenburg
Related Articles/ Videos click below:
The Cost of Abortion & Contraception Deception
Michael Voris talks an in-depth discussion of the true, financial cost of abortion and its effects to the United States. “The inalienable rights of the person must be recognized and respected by civil society and the political authority. These human rights depend neither on single individuals nor on parents; nor do they represent a concession made by society and the state; they belong to human nature and are inherent in the person by virtue of the creative act from which the person took his origin. Among such fundamental rights one should mention in this regard every human being’s right to life and physical integrity from the moment of conception until death” (CDF, Donum vitae III; CCC: 2273).
FBI Contraception Deception.
Modern man has divorced sex from procreation through his embrace of contraception. This Contraception Deception within the CatholicChurch has come about by a near total betrayal of the faithful by their shepherds and leaders.
Contraception & the New Dark Age, Part 1 by Dr. Martin Brenner
Where we are and how we got here. Join Dr. Martin Brenner for this first of a four-part series on the moral evils of contraception.
Contraception and Salvation, Part 2 by Dr. Martin Brenner
Join Dr. Martin Brenner for the second of a four-part series on the moral evils of contraception.
Contraception and Sanctification. Part 3 by Dr. Martin Brenner
Prayer and the Liturgy. Dr. Martin Brenner discusses how contraception is a detriment to our spiritual lives and marital relationships. The infallibility of the Church’s teaching on this matter is also discussed.
Contraception and Sexual Ethics. Part 4 by Dr. Martin Brenner
The Proper Practice. Dr. Martin Brenner describes the importance of spreading the message about the sexual ethic and goes into detail about the alternatives to contraception and their practices.
CIA: The Rockefeller Foundation
We are used to thinking of the Rockefellers as simply a byword for wealth, power and financial success. Perhaps we might think of them as determined businessmen or see them as great philanthropists. But the truth is far different; the Rockefeller Foundation is actively undermining the Catholic Church, and in the process, attempting to erase man’s natural orientation to the eternal.
Global Warming Unmasked
Are the environmental movements and groups simply devoted to laudable, correct stewardship of God’s creation, or do they have a more sinister, hidden agenda? Is “global warming” being used as an excuse for something far darker? Is the final goal of the liberal elites behind the push of junk science population control, eugenics and Gaia worship?
Mic’d Up “Is Contraception Killing the Church?”
This week on Mic’d Up we’ll be tackling the terrible scourge of Contraception on the Church. Michael Hichborn and Rey Flores from American Life League will join us to expose Catholic Relief Services complicity with Organizations who support contraception and to Discuss The Pill Kills Day of Action 2014. Also joining us will be Lynn Mills who will be discussing the continued prayer rally at Providence Park Hospital in the Archdiocese of Detroit because of their complicity in abortion, contraception and sterilization. Following that same thread we’ll break down the announcement from Detroit Archbishop Allen Vigneron concerning the crisis of parish closings facing Detroit. Also dropping by will be author James Kalb, to discuss the plague of pluralism on the Church’s Hierarchy.